Influence of cardiac phases on cortico-spinal excitability: Insights from input-output curves

Visceral signals, such as cardiac oscillations, are considered a significant source influencing ongoing cortical activity. Research has shown that perceptual and cognitive functions fluctuate with the heart cycle. Seminal studies proposed that upstream signals tied to cardiac contraction (i.e., systole) inhibit brain activity. However, a clear relationship between cardiac phases and cortical excitability, measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is not yet established. To examine the link between cardiac signals and corticospinal excitability (CSE), we combined electrophysiological measures with TMS targeting the left motor cortex (lM1) in healthy individuals. Input-output (I/O) curves of MEPs were modelled relative to cardiac phases, assessing CSE variations between systole and diastole. We also investigated how different cardiac output affect MEP amplitudes on a trial-by-trial basis. Overall, I/O curves highlighted a greater inhibition of CSE during systoles, characterized by decreased MEP amplitudes at maximal stimulation intensities and a diminished corticomotor gain. Trial-by-trial assessment also indicated that MEPs amplitude may be negatively affected by the strength of cardiac output, indexed by the length of interbeat-intervals (IBIs). These findings suggest that cardiac signals actively modulate brain excitability, which holds significant implications. Accounting for the cardiac cycle can reduce variability in TMS and electrophysiological studies, improving reproducibility. Clinically, aligning non-invasive brain stimulation or neurorehabilitation protocols with phases of higher excitability (e.g., diastole) may enhance treatment efficacy and motor recovery. More broadly, the results contribute to models of brain-body interaction and may provide a physiological marker of altered heart-brain coupling in clinical populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121789
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of cardiac phases on cortico-spinal excitability: Insights from input-output curves

Paolo Di Luzio, M. Costantini, Francesca Ferri, Mauro Gianni Perrucci
NeuroImage
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Influence of cardiac phases on cortico-spinal excitability: Insights from input-output curves

Paolo Di Luzio, M. Costantini, Francesca Ferri, Mauro Gianni Perrucci
article en

Abstract

Visceral signals, such as cardiac oscillations, are considered a significant source influencing ongoing cortical activity. Research has shown that perceptual and cognitive functions fluctuate with the heart cycle. Seminal studies proposed that upstream signals tied to cardiac contraction (i.e., systole) inhibit brain activity. However, a clear relationship between cardiac phases and cortical excitability, measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is not yet established. To examine the link between cardiac signals and corticospinal excitability (CSE), we combined electrophysiological measures with TMS targeting the left motor cortex (lM1) in healthy individuals. Input-output (I/O) curves of MEPs were modelled relative to cardiac phases, assessing CSE variations between systole and diastole. We also investigated how different cardiac output affect MEP amplitudes on a trial-by-trial basis. Overall, I/O curves highlighted a greater inhibition of CSE during systoles, characterized by decreased MEP amplitudes at maximal stimulation intensities and a diminished corticomotor gain. Trial-by-trial assessment also indicated that MEPs amplitude may be negatively affected by the strength of cardiac output, indexed by the length of interbeat-intervals (IBIs). These findings suggest that cardiac signals actively modulate brain excitability, which holds significant implications. Accounting for the cardiac cycle can reduce variability in TMS and electrophysiological studies, improving reproducibility. Clinically, aligning non-invasive brain stimulation or neurorehabilitation protocols with phases of higher excitability (e.g., diastole) may enhance treatment efficacy and motor recovery. More broadly, the results contribute to models of brain-body interaction and may provide a physiological marker of altered heart-brain coupling in clinical populations.

NeuroImageVol. 328
University of Essex (GB), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.