3839 A scoping review of randomised controlled trials of vaccines that recruited care home residents: lessons for future trials

Abstract Introduction Older care home (CH) residents are particularly vulnerable to infections and often experience adverse outcomes. Despite this group being prioritised for vaccination, no COVID-19 vaccine trials recruited CH residents. Given that the social and biological characteristics of CH residents may influence vaccine effectiveness, it is crucial to test vaccines in this population. Methods The Widening Access to Trials in Care Homes (WATCH) project was established to develop best practice guidance on designing and conducting vaccine trials in the CH population. As part of this project, a scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to identify vaccine trials that recruited CH residents and reported recruitment challenges and strategies. A comprehensive search was carried out in five databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, from 1990 to 2025. Three authors independently screened articles and extracted data. Results are reported as descriptive summaries. Results We retrieved 701 articles and included 20 studies from 11 countries. 7479 participants from 238 CHs were recruited to influenza (N = 17) or pneumococcal (N = 3) vaccine trials. Median sample size was 270 and the weighted mean age was 82.3 years. Screen failure and dropout rate averaged 70% (seven studies) and 8% (five studies), respectively. The two most common reasons for screen failure were residents’ declining participation (46%) and not meeting eligibility criteria (27%). Death (21%) was the most common reason for dropout. Barriers identified include eligibility criteria and recruitment, consent and assent issues, ethical and regulatory concerns, CH-related factors, and study time frame and logistical factors. Facilitators identified include recruitment and data collection methods, consent and assent factors, and collaboration with CHs. Conclusion Our review is the first to report quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to recruiting CH residents in vaccine trials. The findings will assist researchers in planning future vaccine trials in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.149
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3839 A scoping review of randomised controlled trials of vaccines that recruited care home residents: lessons for future trials

Selvarani Subbarayan, S D Shenkin, J K Burton, S S Vasan et al.
Age and Ageing
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

3839 A scoping review of randomised controlled trials of vaccines that recruited care home residents: lessons for future trials

Selvarani Subbarayan, S D Shenkin, J K Burton, S S Vasan, J Scott, I Smith-Dodd, R L Soiza, G Nicolson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Older care home (CH) residents are particularly vulnerable to infections and often experience adverse outcomes. Despite this group being prioritised for vaccination, no COVID-19 vaccine trials recruited CH residents. Given that the social and biological characteristics of CH residents may influence vaccine effectiveness, it is crucial to test vaccines in this population. Methods The Widening Access to Trials in Care Homes (WATCH) project was established to develop best practice guidance on designing and conducting vaccine trials in the CH population. As part of this project, a scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to identify vaccine trials that recruited CH residents and reported recruitment challenges and strategies. A comprehensive search was carried out in five databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, from 1990 to 2025. Three authors independently screened articles and extracted data. Results are reported as descriptive summaries. Results We retrieved 701 articles and included 20 studies from 11 countries. 7479 participants from 238 CHs were recruited to influenza (N = 17) or pneumococcal (N = 3) vaccine trials. Median sample size was 270 and the weighted mean age was 82.3 years. Screen failure and dropout rate averaged 70% (seven studies) and 8% (five studies), respectively. The two most common reasons for screen failure were residents’ declining participation (46%) and not meeting eligibility criteria (27%). Death (21%) was the most common reason for dropout. Barriers identified include eligibility criteria and recruitment, consent and assent issues, ethical and regulatory concerns, CH-related factors, and study time frame and logistical factors. Facilitators identified include recruitment and data collection methods, consent and assent factors, and collaboration with CHs. Conclusion Our review is the first to report quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to recruiting CH residents in vaccine trials. The findings will assist researchers in planning future vaccine trials in this population.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB), Department of Health and Aged Care (AU), NHS Highland (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.