The benefits of biodiversity for livestock farming

Assessing the impact of agricultural activities on biodiversity is a major challenge for the development of more sustainable production systems. This study presents the main findings of an analysis of existing assessment methods, in order to identify their advantages and limitations. Based on a systematic review of the literature, seven methods were selected. Five of them are based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework. These approaches focus mainly on compositional biodiversity (species richness), while functional and structural dimensions remain little explored. In addition to the representation of biodiversity in the methods, the sensitivity of the methods and the inclusion of agricultural practices remain limited due to a lack of suitable data and the complexity of the relationships between practices and biodiversity. Assessment methods are becoming increasingly complex, calling into question their accessibility and understandability. To improve these assessments, we recommend in particular the development of open databases, the development of functional approaches to biodiversity and the coupling of different methods for a better representation of interactions between agriculture and biodiversity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17180/ciag-2026-vol104-art01-gb
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The benefits of biodiversity for livestock farming

Thierry Caquet
SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

The benefits of biodiversity for livestock farming

Thierry Caquet
article en

Abstract

Assessing the impact of agricultural activities on biodiversity is a major challenge for the development of more sustainable production systems. This study presents the main findings of an analysis of existing assessment methods, in order to identify their advantages and limitations. Based on a systematic review of the literature, seven methods were selected. Five of them are based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework. These approaches focus mainly on compositional biodiversity (species richness), while functional and structural dimensions remain little explored. In addition to the representation of biodiversity in the methods, the sensitivity of the methods and the inclusion of agricultural practices remain limited due to a lack of suitable data and the complexity of the relationships between practices and biodiversity. Assessment methods are becoming increasingly complex, calling into question their accessibility and understandability. To improve these assessments, we recommend in particular the development of open databases, the development of functional approaches to biodiversity and the coupling of different methods for a better representation of interactions between agriculture and biodiversity.

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The benefits of biodiversity for livestock farming — Thierry Caquet · SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS