Multilingual Biographical Interviews With Migrated Young People: Translation Practices, Power Relations, and Epistemic Equality

Global migration and the resulting multilingual societies call for in‐depth reflection in social science research. In particular, multilingual and interpreter‐facilitated interviews raise methodological questions regarding translation practices and research interactions. This article explores the methodological implications of multilingualism in interview‐based research, with a focus on power relations. It is based on empirical data from a recent study of migrated youth in state care. In this study, a multi‐perspective research approach is adopted, with narrative‐biographical interviews serving as one of the research methods. This method positions participants as experts in their own life experiences, with the potential to contrast the multiple societal deficit ascriptions that migrant youth in state care experience in everyday life at the intersection of social categories. To observe and understand the social practices that emerge from the study’s design, the article analyses the first interview undertaken. The findings indicate how the different roles and relations of power, dependency, and agency were exercised in the analysed case, from initial access to the field and contact with the interviewee, to the interview situation itself. The results emphasise the importance of researchers engaging in ongoing, iterative reflexivity throughout the multilingual research process, particularly when working with participants in marginalised social positions. The article concludes with a call for systematic empirical engagement with multilingual research practices and deeper methodological sensitivity to the complexities of language, power, and epistemic equality in qualitative research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Inclusion
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10967
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilingual Biographical Interviews With Migrated Young People: Translation Practices, Power Relations, and Epistemic Equality

Luisa Burgmer, Susanne Siebholz
Social Inclusion
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Multilingual Biographical Interviews With Migrated Young People: Translation Practices, Power Relations, and Epistemic Equality

Luisa Burgmer, Susanne Siebholz
article en

Abstract

Global migration and the resulting multilingual societies call for in‐depth reflection in social science research. In particular, multilingual and interpreter‐facilitated interviews raise methodological questions regarding translation practices and research interactions. This article explores the methodological implications of multilingualism in interview‐based research, with a focus on power relations. It is based on empirical data from a recent study of migrated youth in state care. In this study, a multi‐perspective research approach is adopted, with narrative‐biographical interviews serving as one of the research methods. This method positions participants as experts in their own life experiences, with the potential to contrast the multiple societal deficit ascriptions that migrant youth in state care experience in everyday life at the intersection of social categories. To observe and understand the social practices that emerge from the study’s design, the article analyses the first interview undertaken. The findings indicate how the different roles and relations of power, dependency, and agency were exercised in the analysed case, from initial access to the field and contact with the interviewee, to the interview situation itself. The results emphasise the importance of researchers engaging in ongoing, iterative reflexivity throughout the multilingual research process, particularly when working with participants in marginalised social positions. The article concludes with a call for systematic empirical engagement with multilingual research practices and deeper methodological sensitivity to the complexities of language, power, and epistemic equality in qualitative research.

Social InclusionVol. 14
Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Technische Universität Chemnitz, Freistaat Sachsen
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.