Exploring stakeholder perceptions of peer support initiatives in the management of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: An online survey study

Peer support is an effective strategy to promote self-management behaviors and improve well-being in those with cardiometabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is limited knowledge about stakeholder perceptions regarding peer support programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study assessed stakeholders' awareness and understanding of peer support initiatives for T2DM, and explored their perceived barriers and readiness for implementation. A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey with branching logic was distributed to stakeholders across macro- (health policy), meso (tertiary hospital), and micro (community) levels of LMIC healthcare systems from June 1 to December 15, 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. A total of 69 respondents from 25 LMICs participated in the survey. Due to branching logic and response attrition, 53 surveys (77%) had complete responses. Most respondents were medical doctors (n = 35, 50.7%) and a large proportion worked in tertiary hospitals (n = 27, 39.1%). Thirty-nine respondents (56.5%) were aware of peer support; among the 38 respondents with complete data, 29 (76%) reported active involvement in T2DM peer support initiatives. Of 15 responses to open-ended questionnaires regarding barriers to T2DM peer support, 9 (60%) cited concerns about limited resources and lack of funding. Local leadership (mean ± standard deviation: 3.4 ± 1.2), resource allocation (2.7 ± 1.4), and sustainability planning (2.7 ± 1.4) showed the highest perceived readiness on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Stakeholders in LMICs demonstrate awareness and active involvement in T2DM peer support programs. While limited resources and funding remain significant barriers, local leadership, resource allocation, and sustainability planning showed the highest perceived readiness, indicating promising foundations for implementation. Strengthening these areas through targeted support could facilitate the expansion and sustainability of peer support initiatives in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005840
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring stakeholder perceptions of peer support initiatives in the management of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: An online survey study

Soahum Bagchi, Bishal Gyawali, Israa Fadhil Yaseen, Zainab Atiyah Dakhil et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Exploring stakeholder perceptions of peer support initiatives in the management of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: An online survey study

Soahum Bagchi, Bishal Gyawali, Israa Fadhil Yaseen, Zainab Atiyah Dakhil, Lilian Pinto da Silva, Sheila Klassen, Pooja Dewan, Diana Sherifali
article en

Abstract

Peer support is an effective strategy to promote self-management behaviors and improve well-being in those with cardiometabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There is limited knowledge about stakeholder perceptions regarding peer support programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The study assessed stakeholders' awareness and understanding of peer support initiatives for T2DM, and explored their perceived barriers and readiness for implementation. A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey with branching logic was distributed to stakeholders across macro- (health policy), meso (tertiary hospital), and micro (community) levels of LMIC healthcare systems from June 1 to December 15, 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic content analysis. A total of 69 respondents from 25 LMICs participated in the survey. Due to branching logic and response attrition, 53 surveys (77%) had complete responses. Most respondents were medical doctors (n = 35, 50.7%) and a large proportion worked in tertiary hospitals (n = 27, 39.1%). Thirty-nine respondents (56.5%) were aware of peer support; among the 38 respondents with complete data, 29 (76%) reported active involvement in T2DM peer support initiatives. Of 15 responses to open-ended questionnaires regarding barriers to T2DM peer support, 9 (60%) cited concerns about limited resources and lack of funding. Local leadership (mean ± standard deviation: 3.4 ± 1.2), resource allocation (2.7 ± 1.4), and sustainability planning (2.7 ± 1.4) showed the highest perceived readiness on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Stakeholders in LMICs demonstrate awareness and active involvement in T2DM peer support programs. While limited resources and funding remain significant barriers, local leadership, resource allocation, and sustainability planning showed the highest perceived readiness, indicating promising foundations for implementation. Strengthening these areas through targeted support could facilitate the expansion and sustainability of peer support initiatives in resource-constrained settings.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(2)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), University of Copenhagen (DK), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), University of Baghdad (IQ), Harvard University (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Baghdad Medical City (IQ), Kettering General Hospital (GB), British Heart Foundation (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), McMaster University (CA)
World Heart Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.