Modeling the coupled and decoupled states of polar boundary-layer mixed-phase clouds

Abstract. Representing mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) is a long-standing challenge for climate models, with major consequences regarding the simulation of radiative fluxes at high-latitudes and uncertainties in future cryosphere melting estimates. Low-level boundary-layer MPCs that prevail at high-latitudes can be either coupled or decoupled to the surface, which modulates their dynamical and microphysical properties. This study leverages a recent physically-based parameterization of phase partitioning considering an explicit coupling between microphysics and subgrid-scale dynamics and involving direct interactions between the cloud and turbulent diffusion schemes. This parameterization makes it possible to capture the structure of the decoupled state of polar boundary-layer MPCs – with a supercooled liquid dominated cloud-top sitting on top of precipitating ice crystals – in single column simulations with the LMDZ Atmospheric General Circulation Model. The positive feedback loop involving cloud-top radiative cooling induced by supercooled liquid droplets, subsequent buoyancy production of turbulence as well as the supercooled liquid water production associated with turbulence, is captured by the model. However, the liquid and cloud ice water path remain underestimated and most of the turbulence is confined near cloud top which is probably due to a missing parameterization for convective downdrafts in the model. The study further shows that accounting for the detrainment of shallow convective plume's air when diagnosing the in-cloud supersaturation makes it possible to capture the overall vertical structure of surface-coupled clouds, with realistic liquid and ice water contents. Nonetheless, a parameteric sensitivity analysis emphasizes the importance of properly calibrating the parameter controling the supercooled liquid water production term by subgrid turbulence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1847-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the coupled and decoupled states of polar boundary-layer mixed-phase clouds

Lea Raillard, Audran Borella, G. Rivière, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
36.62
article

Modeling the coupled and decoupled states of polar boundary-layer mixed-phase clouds

Lea Raillard, Audran Borella, G. Rivière, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine, Étienne Vignon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Representing mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) is a long-standing challenge for climate models, with major consequences regarding the simulation of radiative fluxes at high-latitudes and uncertainties in future cryosphere melting estimates. Low-level boundary-layer MPCs that prevail at high-latitudes can be either coupled or decoupled to the surface, which modulates their dynamical and microphysical properties. This study leverages a recent physically-based parameterization of phase partitioning considering an explicit coupling between microphysics and subgrid-scale dynamics and involving direct interactions between the cloud and turbulent diffusion schemes. This parameterization makes it possible to capture the structure of the decoupled state of polar boundary-layer MPCs – with a supercooled liquid dominated cloud-top sitting on top of precipitating ice crystals – in single column simulations with the LMDZ Atmospheric General Circulation Model. The positive feedback loop involving cloud-top radiative cooling induced by supercooled liquid droplets, subsequent buoyancy production of turbulence as well as the supercooled liquid water production associated with turbulence, is captured by the model. However, the liquid and cloud ice water path remain underestimated and most of the turbulence is confined near cloud top which is probably due to a missing parameterization for convective downdrafts in the model. The study further shows that accounting for the detrainment of shallow convective plume's air when diagnosing the in-cloud supersaturation makes it possible to capture the overall vertical structure of surface-coupled clouds, with realistic liquid and ice water contents. Nonetheless, a parameteric sensitivity analysis emphasizes the importance of properly calibrating the parameter controling the supercooled liquid water production term by subgrid turbulence.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(3)
Université d'Orléans (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR), Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (FR), Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l’Environnement et de l’Espace (FR)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.