3829 Evaluating and improving post-operative pain management in hip fracture patients: a multidisciplinary quality improvement project

Abstract Introduction Early mobilisation following hip fracture surgery is a key determinant of better health outcomes and reduced mortality. However, high levels of postoperative pain and inconsistent analgesia administration were noted as barriers to mobilisation on our dedicated femoral fracture unit. This quality improvement project aimed to understand pain and analgesia on the unit, and in doing so, target better pain relief to improve outcomes through optimised engagement with therapy. Methods Baseline data were collected on 26 post-operative patients to assess subjective pain scores (or Abbey Pain Scale where appropriate), pre-operative prescribing bundle adherence, and administration of PRN analgesia. Semi-structured interviews with ward nurses and therapy staff explored barriers to effective pain management and access to PRN analgesia. Using Model for Improvement methodology multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were undertaken, including a test of change to trial use of a buprenorphine patch, staff education to target prescribing behaviours and nursing workflow optimisation. Results Initial data showed 30% of patients reported pain ≥8/10 on day one, with poor correlation between pain scores and PRN analgesia administered. Qualitative data revealed key barriers included staff workload, controlled drug (CD) access delays, poor interprofessional communication, and hesitancy around use of stronger opioids. Introduction of a one-off buprenorphine patch resulted in a 20% reduction in day one pain and a 23% reduction on day two. The highest reported pain was 7/10 (vs 10/10 pre-intervention). No significant increase in postoperative delirium was noted. However, PRN administration remained inconsistent despite improvements in pre-op analgesia bundle prescribing and communication strategies. Conclusion This multifaceted, multidisciplinary quality improvement project has provided valuable insight into understanding pain and analgesia on the hip fracture unit. The project has highlighted focus areas for strategies to reduce postoperative pain. However further work is required to address persistent barriers to PRN analgesia administration and promote sustained prescribing behaviours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.076
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3829 Evaluating and improving post-operative pain management in hip fracture patients: a multidisciplinary quality improvement project

Samuel Healy, Charles A. Porter, Arun Joshi, M Rahman et al.
Age and Ageing
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

3829 Evaluating and improving post-operative pain management in hip fracture patients: a multidisciplinary quality improvement project

Samuel Healy, Charles A. Porter, Arun Joshi, M Rahman, S Conroy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Early mobilisation following hip fracture surgery is a key determinant of better health outcomes and reduced mortality. However, high levels of postoperative pain and inconsistent analgesia administration were noted as barriers to mobilisation on our dedicated femoral fracture unit. This quality improvement project aimed to understand pain and analgesia on the unit, and in doing so, target better pain relief to improve outcomes through optimised engagement with therapy. Methods Baseline data were collected on 26 post-operative patients to assess subjective pain scores (or Abbey Pain Scale where appropriate), pre-operative prescribing bundle adherence, and administration of PRN analgesia. Semi-structured interviews with ward nurses and therapy staff explored barriers to effective pain management and access to PRN analgesia. Using Model for Improvement methodology multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were undertaken, including a test of change to trial use of a buprenorphine patch, staff education to target prescribing behaviours and nursing workflow optimisation. Results Initial data showed 30% of patients reported pain ≥8/10 on day one, with poor correlation between pain scores and PRN analgesia administered. Qualitative data revealed key barriers included staff workload, controlled drug (CD) access delays, poor interprofessional communication, and hesitancy around use of stronger opioids. Introduction of a one-off buprenorphine patch resulted in a 20% reduction in day one pain and a 23% reduction on day two. The highest reported pain was 7/10 (vs 10/10 pre-intervention). No significant increase in postoperative delirium was noted. However, PRN administration remained inconsistent despite improvements in pre-op analgesia bundle prescribing and communication strategies. Conclusion This multifaceted, multidisciplinary quality improvement project has provided valuable insight into understanding pain and analgesia on the hip fracture unit. The project has highlighted focus areas for strategies to reduce postoperative pain. However further work is required to address persistent barriers to PRN analgesia administration and promote sustained prescribing behaviours.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.