Systemic Leadership and Educational Equity: A Review of Proposals from International Organizations

This article analyzes how the OECD and UNESCO conceptualize and develop proposals linking systemic leadership with educational equity. These proposals aim to address the challenges of an increasingly complex global scenario in which management efficiency must be balanced with the need to strengthen the public value of educational policies. A qualitative descriptive-analytical design based on the analysis of 37 strategic documents from both institutions was used to study and compare their perspectives on equity, guidelines on systemic leadership, and proposed practices for implementing it. The results show that the OECD favors a vision of systemic leadership that focuses on improving management capacities, multiscale coordination, and the strategic use of data to enhance policy effectiveness. Meanwhile, UNESCO’s proposals lean toward a more transformative and social vision of systemic leadership, with a greater number and variety of references to inclusion, democratic participation, and social justice. The conclusions highlight the importance of linking research on educational leadership with research on educational policies. Systemic leadership can be a fundamental link in this regard if it balances visions of the purposes of education (the what) with strategic definitions for achieving them (the how).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020251
Primary Topic
Education and Teacher Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic Leadership and Educational Equity: A Review of Proposals from International Organizations

Luis Felipe de la Vega
Education Sciences
Education and Teacher Training
article

Systemic Leadership and Educational Equity: A Review of Proposals from International Organizations

Luis Felipe de la Vega
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes how the OECD and UNESCO conceptualize and develop proposals linking systemic leadership with educational equity. These proposals aim to address the challenges of an increasingly complex global scenario in which management efficiency must be balanced with the need to strengthen the public value of educational policies. A qualitative descriptive-analytical design based on the analysis of 37 strategic documents from both institutions was used to study and compare their perspectives on equity, guidelines on systemic leadership, and proposed practices for implementing it. The results show that the OECD favors a vision of systemic leadership that focuses on improving management capacities, multiscale coordination, and the strategic use of data to enhance policy effectiveness. Meanwhile, UNESCO’s proposals lean toward a more transformative and social vision of systemic leadership, with a greater number and variety of references to inclusion, democratic participation, and social justice. The conclusions highlight the importance of linking research on educational leadership with research on educational policies. Systemic leadership can be a fundamental link in this regard if it balances visions of the purposes of education (the what) with strategic definitions for achieving them (the how).

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Education and Teacher Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systemic Leadership and Educational Equity: A Review of Proposals from International Organizations — Luis Felipe de la Vega · Education Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS