How facilitators use healthcare students’ mistakes to promote reflections and discussions during simulation debriefings

The main findings provide new insights into facilitators' actions when eliciting student reflections and discussions. Many structured debriefing frameworks today include inquiries, positive feedback, and hints and cues. This analysis identified additional communication elements not previously recognized in the debriefing literature, namely suppressions and the use of summaries. Few studies have examined the facilitators' actions during debriefings to elicit student reflection and discussion, particularly through naturalistic observation of real-world practice. Further research is needed to expand our understanding of these interactional dynamics and the situated strategies employed by facilitators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Simulation
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00412-3
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How facilitators use healthcare students’ mistakes to promote reflections and discussions during simulation debriefings

Astrid Camilla Wiig, Helén Berg, Wenche Lervik, Mads Solberg
Advances in Simulation
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

How facilitators use healthcare students’ mistakes to promote reflections and discussions during simulation debriefings

Astrid Camilla Wiig, Helén Berg, Wenche Lervik, Mads Solberg
article en

Abstract

The main findings provide new insights into facilitators' actions when eliciting student reflections and discussions. Many structured debriefing frameworks today include inquiries, positive feedback, and hints and cues. This analysis identified additional communication elements not previously recognized in the debriefing literature, namely suppressions and the use of summaries. Few studies have examined the facilitators' actions during debriefings to elicit student reflection and discussion, particularly through naturalistic observation of real-world practice. Further research is needed to expand our understanding of these interactional dynamics and the situated strategies employed by facilitators.

Advances in SimulationVol. 11(1)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Ålesund Hospital (NO), Norwegian Coastal Administration (NO)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norges Forskningsråd, St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How facilitators use healthcare students’ mistakes to promote reflections and discussions during simulation debriefings — Astrid Camilla Wiig, Helén Berg, et al. · Advances in Simulation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS