Agricultural water management in a changing Maryland: stakeholder experiences and attitudes towards weather variability, alternative water sources, and related factors

The state of Maryland has experienced significant but commonly overlooked impacts on water quality and quantity. Future climate change is predicted to further reduce water availability, with nontraditional water sources such as treated recycled wastewater (TRW) as one potential way to mitigate impacts. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 Maryland stakeholders—including farmers, extension agents, state agency personnel, and academics—to explore their perceptions and experiences with 1) past, existing and future weather variability; 2) freshwater and reusable water use and management in agriculture; and 3) related factors impacting agricultural water management. Qualitative coding of interview transcripts produced 27 categories containing 291 unique codes and 121 sub-codes. Analysis revealed 24% of interviewees were hesitant to confirm climate change as a human-caused phenomenon, yet all interviewees described changes to the weather over recent decades, including drought, high rainfall events, extreme and unpredictable weather, and changes in temperature. Over half of interviewees had some knowledge of TRW in agriculture, and a majority thought it would be valuable; however, none had direct experience with its application. Many identified implementation barriers, with Distance, Infrastructure/Transport, Cost, and Contamination Concern as the most common codes. Many interviewees did not believe that water provisioning for agriculture was a problem because the region receives enough or more than enough precipitation. Related factors mentioned by interviewees included tension between residential and agricultural water use, land ownership, and concerns over existing or potential regulations. These findings inform our research exploring the use of TRW to support Maryland water sustainability under projected climate scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1650298
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural water management in a changing Maryland: stakeholder experiences and attitudes towards weather variability, alternative water sources, and related factors

Michele Romolini, Amanda Rockler, Paul T. Leisnham, Adel Shirmohammadi et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
35.31
article

Agricultural water management in a changing Maryland: stakeholder experiences and attitudes towards weather variability, alternative water sources, and related factors

Michele Romolini, Amanda Rockler, Paul T. Leisnham, Adel Shirmohammadi, Masoud Negahban-Azar, Alexa C. Siglar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The state of Maryland has experienced significant but commonly overlooked impacts on water quality and quantity. Future climate change is predicted to further reduce water availability, with nontraditional water sources such as treated recycled wastewater (TRW) as one potential way to mitigate impacts. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 Maryland stakeholders—including farmers, extension agents, state agency personnel, and academics—to explore their perceptions and experiences with 1) past, existing and future weather variability; 2) freshwater and reusable water use and management in agriculture; and 3) related factors impacting agricultural water management. Qualitative coding of interview transcripts produced 27 categories containing 291 unique codes and 121 sub-codes. Analysis revealed 24% of interviewees were hesitant to confirm climate change as a human-caused phenomenon, yet all interviewees described changes to the weather over recent decades, including drought, high rainfall events, extreme and unpredictable weather, and changes in temperature. Over half of interviewees had some knowledge of TRW in agriculture, and a majority thought it would be valuable; however, none had direct experience with its application. Many identified implementation barriers, with Distance, Infrastructure/Transport, Cost, and Contamination Concern as the most common codes. Many interviewees did not believe that water provisioning for agriculture was a problem because the region receives enough or more than enough precipitation. Related factors mentioned by interviewees included tension between residential and agricultural water use, land ownership, and concerns over existing or potential regulations. These findings inform our research exploring the use of TRW to support Maryland water sustainability under projected climate scenarios.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 14
Loyola Marymount University (US), Maryland Sea Grant (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
35.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.