Intravenous Lidocaine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effective postoperative recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains a significant challenge, with patients frequently experiencing moderate to severe pain, pulmonary decline, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) despite modern multimodal analgesia. Intravenous lidocaine has been proposed as an opioid-sparing adjunct with systemic analgesic and antihyperalgesia properties, but its role in VATS is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a total of 31 studies, of which 9 randomized controlled trials involving 672 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final quantitative and qualitative synthesis. Five trials (n = 328) assessing 24-hour opioid use and 3 trials (n = 242) assessing 48-hour use showed no reduction in postoperative morphine consumption with lidocaine. Similarly, pooled movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours (3 trials, n = 200 each) demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Although 4 trials (n = 272) reported a marked reduction in intraoperative remifentanil requirements, this did not translate into improved postoperative analgesia. In contrast, lidocaine produced a consistently favorable antiemetic effect: 5 trials (n = 360) showed a significant reduction in PONV with negligible heterogeneity. Limitations included small sample sizes, varying bolus and infusion regimens, heterogeneity in background analgesic protocols, and incomplete reporting of outcomes such as inflammatory markers and pulmonary physiology, all of which reduce confidence in effect estimates. Overall, current evidence indicates that while intravenous lidocaine is safe and offers a reproducible reduction in PONV, it does not improve postoperative pain or opioid consumption following VATS. Larger, standardized trials are required to determine whether specific subgroups or dosing strategies may yield a greater benefit in thoracic minimally invasive surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2026.02.001
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intravenous Lidocaine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Tahmid Kabir, Mohammad Abir Mamun, Yumna Saleem, Yahya El-Tahlawy et al.
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Intravenous Lidocaine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Tahmid Kabir, Mohammad Abir Mamun, Yumna Saleem, Yahya El-Tahlawy, Wajeeh Ullah Mahmood, Omar Lubbad
article en

Abstract

Effective postoperative recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) remains a significant challenge, with patients frequently experiencing moderate to severe pain, pulmonary decline, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) despite modern multimodal analgesia. Intravenous lidocaine has been proposed as an opioid-sparing adjunct with systemic analgesic and antihyperalgesia properties, but its role in VATS is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a total of 31 studies, of which 9 randomized controlled trials involving 672 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final quantitative and qualitative synthesis. Five trials (n = 328) assessing 24-hour opioid use and 3 trials (n = 242) assessing 48-hour use showed no reduction in postoperative morphine consumption with lidocaine. Similarly, pooled movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours (3 trials, n = 200 each) demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Although 4 trials (n = 272) reported a marked reduction in intraoperative remifentanil requirements, this did not translate into improved postoperative analgesia. In contrast, lidocaine produced a consistently favorable antiemetic effect: 5 trials (n = 360) showed a significant reduction in PONV with negligible heterogeneity. Limitations included small sample sizes, varying bolus and infusion regimens, heterogeneity in background analgesic protocols, and incomplete reporting of outcomes such as inflammatory markers and pulmonary physiology, all of which reduce confidence in effect estimates. Overall, current evidence indicates that while intravenous lidocaine is safe and offers a reproducible reduction in PONV, it does not improve postoperative pain or opioid consumption following VATS. Larger, standardized trials are required to determine whether specific subgroups or dosing strategies may yield a greater benefit in thoracic minimally invasive surgery.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.