The Assessment Checklist for Adolescents Plus (ACA+) Mental Health and Relational Strengths Measure for Adolescents in Statutory Out-Of-Home Care: Content Validity and Factor Structure for a Residential Care Sample

BackgroundThe Assessment Checklist for Adolescents Plus (ACA+) is a 30-item caregiver-report mental health and relational strengths measure, containing items that are the converse of maltreatment-related mental health and relational difficulties measured by the Assessment Checklist for Adolescents (ACA) and its short form (ACA-SF). The present study is the first to investigate the ACA+'s content validity and factor structure.MethodsACA+ and ACA-SF scores were obtained for 220 adolescents (50.9% boys), aged 12-18 years, living in residential out-of-home care (OOHC) in the UK. Item validity was estimated from item score distributions (item means and prevalence), and correlations with ACA+ total and ACA-SF scale scores. Factor structure was investigated using principal components factor analysis.ResultsAs anticipated, all item-rest correlations were positive (<i>r</i> = .20 to .58), while correlations with the ACA-SF total score were all negative. However, items measuring emotion sharing and relational intimacy were positively correlated with several ACA-SF sub-scale scores, suggesting that among some adolescents these items measure maladaptive dysregulated emotion and relational difficulties. To maximise clinical utility, two sets of factor analyses were performed, yielding: a 21-item four-factor solution that can be safely interpreted by children's agencies; and a 29-item six-factor solution that requires skilled interpretation by mental health clinicians. Factor analyses explained 53.9% and 75.1% of the score variance respectively.ConclusionsThe present analyses suggest the ACA+ has strong content and factorial validity for assessment of adolescents in residential OOHC. Further research is needed to establish its validity for use with adolescents in foster and kinship care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045261422781
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Assessment Checklist for Adolescents Plus (ACA+) Mental Health and Relational Strengths Measure for Adolescents in Statutory Out-Of-Home Care: Content Validity and Factor Structure for a Residential Care Sample

Astrid R. Seim, Michael Tarren‐Sweeney, Sarah Elgie
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

The Assessment Checklist for Adolescents Plus (ACA+) Mental Health and Relational Strengths Measure for Adolescents in Statutory Out-Of-Home Care: Content Validity and Factor Structure for a Residential Care Sample

Astrid R. Seim, Michael Tarren‐Sweeney, Sarah Elgie
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe Assessment Checklist for Adolescents Plus (ACA+) is a 30-item caregiver-report mental health and relational strengths measure, containing items that are the converse of maltreatment-related mental health and relational difficulties measured by the Assessment Checklist for Adolescents (ACA) and its short form (ACA-SF). The present study is the first to investigate the ACA+'s content validity and factor structure.MethodsACA+ and ACA-SF scores were obtained for 220 adolescents (50.9% boys), aged 12-18 years, living in residential out-of-home care (OOHC) in the UK. Item validity was estimated from item score distributions (item means and prevalence), and correlations with ACA+ total and ACA-SF scale scores. Factor structure was investigated using principal components factor analysis.ResultsAs anticipated, all item-rest correlations were positive (<i>r</i> = .20 to .58), while correlations with the ACA-SF total score were all negative. However, items measuring emotion sharing and relational intimacy were positively correlated with several ACA-SF sub-scale scores, suggesting that among some adolescents these items measure maladaptive dysregulated emotion and relational difficulties. To maximise clinical utility, two sets of factor analyses were performed, yielding: a 21-item four-factor solution that can be safely interpreted by children's agencies; and a 29-item six-factor solution that requires skilled interpretation by mental health clinicians. Factor analyses explained 53.9% and 75.1% of the score variance respectively.ConclusionsThe present analyses suggest the ACA+ has strong content and factorial validity for assessment of adolescents in residential OOHC. Further research is needed to establish its validity for use with adolescents in foster and kinship care.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
University of Canterbury (NZ), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.