Wound Dressings in Veterinary Small Animal Medicine - A systematic review

The purpose of this diploma thesis was to show that in veterinary clinical research, only 30% of the currently published records are high-quality trials with well- designed protocols that can be classified as gold or higher. To give an overview of the topic, the classification of wounds was described and a short summary about current wound management methods was given. To understand the different wound dressings that were detailed in the included publications, it was also necessary to explain the most common wound dressings used in small animal medicine and to compare the possible uses. In this thesis, all records were included that investigated the effect of different wound dressing materials in small animal medicine, especially in dogs and cats. In vivo publications in English or German were included. The literature was found through the use of several search engines such as pubmed, scopus, google scholar and vetmedseeker. By searching through this databases, it was possible to identify 126 publications that matched the used keywords. After a rough analysis, nearly 81% of these records could be excluded due to several factors like being written in the wrong language. Ultimately, 26 publications could be included and were analyzed based on the guidelines definded by GRADE and classified into level based on Santesso et al. (2006). It became clear, that it is not possible to achieve the evidence level standards that are set in human medicine, so an adjustment to the current evidence classes was made. Yet most of the publications did not fulfill the criteria, despite having well- designed study protocols. These publications, with their great study-design and their objective investigation methods, showed that even in the veterinary field, it is possible to achieve a scienticically significant outcome. During the course of this systematic review, the hypothesis that was initially set was confirmed, because none of the included papers could achieve gold level or higher.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34876/2mf2-9w64
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wound Dressings in Veterinary Small Animal Medicine - A systematic review

Anna Kurtscheidt
Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Wound Dressings in Veterinary Small Animal Medicine - A systematic review

Anna Kurtscheidt
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this diploma thesis was to show that in veterinary clinical research, only 30% of the currently published records are high-quality trials with well- designed protocols that can be classified as gold or higher. To give an overview of the topic, the classification of wounds was described and a short summary about current wound management methods was given. To understand the different wound dressings that were detailed in the included publications, it was also necessary to explain the most common wound dressings used in small animal medicine and to compare the possible uses. In this thesis, all records were included that investigated the effect of different wound dressing materials in small animal medicine, especially in dogs and cats. In vivo publications in English or German were included. The literature was found through the use of several search engines such as pubmed, scopus, google scholar and vetmedseeker. By searching through this databases, it was possible to identify 126 publications that matched the used keywords. After a rough analysis, nearly 81% of these records could be excluded due to several factors like being written in the wrong language. Ultimately, 26 publications could be included and were analyzed based on the guidelines definded by GRADE and classified into level based on Santesso et al. (2006). It became clear, that it is not possible to achieve the evidence level standards that are set in human medicine, so an adjustment to the current evidence classes was made. Yet most of the publications did not fulfill the criteria, despite having well- designed study protocols. These publications, with their great study-design and their objective investigation methods, showed that even in the veterinary field, it is possible to achieve a scienticically significant outcome. During the course of this systematic review, the hypothesis that was initially set was confirmed, because none of the included papers could achieve gold level or higher.

Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.