Heavy metal exposure among industrial workers mechanisms of toxicity biomonitoring strategies and public health risk assessment

Exposure to heavy metals is still a significant occupational health issue in the manufacturing industry and millions of workers globally are exposed to heavy metal substances. Many industrial processes, such as mining, smelting, welding, electroplating, battery manufacturing, and electronic waste recycling, result in exposure to airborne fumes, dust, and contaminated surfaces, leading to inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption of metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel, and manganese. Chronic exposure results in oxidative stress, inhibition of enzymes, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and epigenetic alterations, culminating in detrimental health effects on the nervous system, kidneys, liver, and cardiovascular system. A biomonitoring assay that tests blood, urine, hair, and nails can fully check for internal exposure in addition to environmental monitoring and provides the opportunity to detect subclinical toxicity early. Guidance is given by established reference values and occupational exposure limits, while biomarkers of effect, either renal or neurobehavioral indicators, serve as the basis for risk assessment on the basis of exposure. This review highlights current research on sources and pathways of occupational heavy metal exposure, elucidates the molecular and systemic mechanisms of toxicity, and identifies biomonitoring strategies for risk assessment. Focus is on co-exposure scenarios, vulnerable worker populations, and the application of biomarker-based surveillance in prevention with occupational health in the workplace as part of occupational health prevention programs. In conclusion, combining ecological surveillance with biomarker-based biomonitoring is a strong way to find and stop heavy metal–related occupational diseases promptly, especially when people are exposed to more than one substance at a time. To safeguard vulnerable workers and lower long-term health risks, it is important to strengthen this kind of monitoring in occupational health initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-01431-1
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heavy metal exposure among industrial workers mechanisms of toxicity biomonitoring strategies and public health risk assessment

Mathiyazhagan Narayanan
Discover Public Health
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
article

Heavy metal exposure among industrial workers mechanisms of toxicity biomonitoring strategies and public health risk assessment

Mathiyazhagan Narayanan
article en

Abstract

Exposure to heavy metals is still a significant occupational health issue in the manufacturing industry and millions of workers globally are exposed to heavy metal substances. Many industrial processes, such as mining, smelting, welding, electroplating, battery manufacturing, and electronic waste recycling, result in exposure to airborne fumes, dust, and contaminated surfaces, leading to inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption of metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel, and manganese. Chronic exposure results in oxidative stress, inhibition of enzymes, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and epigenetic alterations, culminating in detrimental health effects on the nervous system, kidneys, liver, and cardiovascular system. A biomonitoring assay that tests blood, urine, hair, and nails can fully check for internal exposure in addition to environmental monitoring and provides the opportunity to detect subclinical toxicity early. Guidance is given by established reference values and occupational exposure limits, while biomarkers of effect, either renal or neurobehavioral indicators, serve as the basis for risk assessment on the basis of exposure. This review highlights current research on sources and pathways of occupational heavy metal exposure, elucidates the molecular and systemic mechanisms of toxicity, and identifies biomonitoring strategies for risk assessment. Focus is on co-exposure scenarios, vulnerable worker populations, and the application of biomarker-based surveillance in prevention with occupational health in the workplace as part of occupational health prevention programs. In conclusion, combining ecological surveillance with biomarker-based biomonitoring is a strong way to find and stop heavy metal–related occupational diseases promptly, especially when people are exposed to more than one substance at a time. To safeguard vulnerable workers and lower long-term health risks, it is important to strengthen this kind of monitoring in occupational health initiatives.

Discover Public HealthVol. 23(1)
Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heavy metal exposure among industrial workers mechanisms of toxicity biomonitoring strategies and public health risk assessment — Mathiyazhagan Narayanan · Discover Public Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS