Clinical validation of a novel accelerometer-based respiratory rate monitor

Respiratory rate (RR) is a vital sign often unused in clinical practice due to labour-intensive manual counting or capnography limitations in spontaneously breathing patients. This study validated RespX, a novel accelerometer-based wireless sensor, for continuous respiratory rate measurement in hospitalised patients. This prospective, single-centre observational study included hospitalised adults (> 18 years) expected to remain undisturbed for one hour while measuring RR. The RespX sensor, placed on the left chest wall, was compared with continuous capnography and manual counting every 20 min for one hour. The primary endpoint was respiratory rate measured by RespX within ± 3 breaths per minute compared to capnography. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed mean differences between methods. Twenty-nine patients completed the study. The proportion of RespX measurements within ± 3 breaths per minute of capnography was 77% (95% CI: 74.8-79.0%) for raw data and 82.8% (95% CI: 80.7-84.7%) after removing outliers. The proportion of RespX measurements within ± 3 breaths per minute of manual counting was 87,5% (95% CI: 81,1%-93,8%). For the capnography the proportions for the raw data was 87,8% (95% CI: 81,8-93,8%) and 94,5% (95% CI: 90,3%-98,7%) after removing outliers. Linear mixed-effects analysis showed mean differences of -0.40 (p = 0.43) for raw data and 0.39 (p = 0.15) for filtered data between RespX and capnography, supporting their equivalence. RespX demonstrated lower measurement variability (SD: 0.75-3.05) compared to capnography (SD: 0.99-5.19). No adverse events were observed during the study. The wireless RespX accelerometer-based sensor provides a novel and accurate method for assessing the respiratory rate in awake hospitalised patients compared with capnography.Trial registration: NCT06911541.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01419-x
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical validation of a novel accelerometer-based respiratory rate monitor

O. Ødegaard-Olsen, A. Tunset, I. Jammer, O. M. Steihaug et al.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Clinical validation of a novel accelerometer-based respiratory rate monitor

O. Ødegaard-Olsen, A. Tunset, I. Jammer, O. M. Steihaug, T. E. Sjøset, A. D. Sleire, A. S. Stordal
article en

Abstract

Respiratory rate (RR) is a vital sign often unused in clinical practice due to labour-intensive manual counting or capnography limitations in spontaneously breathing patients. This study validated RespX, a novel accelerometer-based wireless sensor, for continuous respiratory rate measurement in hospitalised patients. This prospective, single-centre observational study included hospitalised adults (> 18 years) expected to remain undisturbed for one hour while measuring RR. The RespX sensor, placed on the left chest wall, was compared with continuous capnography and manual counting every 20 min for one hour. The primary endpoint was respiratory rate measured by RespX within ± 3 breaths per minute compared to capnography. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed mean differences between methods. Twenty-nine patients completed the study. The proportion of RespX measurements within ± 3 breaths per minute of capnography was 77% (95% CI: 74.8-79.0%) for raw data and 82.8% (95% CI: 80.7-84.7%) after removing outliers. The proportion of RespX measurements within ± 3 breaths per minute of manual counting was 87,5% (95% CI: 81,1%-93,8%). For the capnography the proportions for the raw data was 87,8% (95% CI: 81,8-93,8%) and 94,5% (95% CI: 90,3%-98,7%) after removing outliers. Linear mixed-effects analysis showed mean differences of -0.40 (p = 0.43) for raw data and 0.39 (p = 0.15) for filtered data between RespX and capnography, supporting their equivalence. RespX demonstrated lower measurement variability (SD: 0.75-3.05) compared to capnography (SD: 0.99-5.19). No adverse events were observed during the study. The wireless RespX accelerometer-based sensor provides a novel and accurate method for assessing the respiratory rate in awake hospitalised patients compared with capnography.Trial registration: NCT06911541.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
University Hospital of North Norway (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Deaconess Hospital (US), NORCE Research AS (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.