A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POSSESSIVE CASE SUFFIXES IN KOREAN AND UZBEK

This study analyzes possessive suffixes in Korean and Uzbek from a contrastive linguistic perspective. The purpose of the study is to examine typological and pragmatic differences between the two languages. In Korean, possession is expressed by attaching -ui to a noun, but in actual spoken usage it is often omitted or replaced, and in many cases possession is determined by the conversational context. In contrast, Uzbek expresses possession through grammatical possessive suffixes according to person, such as -im, -ing, -i, -miz, -ingiz, and -lari, which clearly reflect the characteristics of an agglutinative language. Furthermore, in both Korean and Uzbek, possessive expressions show various pragmatic variations depending on factors such as the social relationship and degree of familiarity between the speaker and the listener, as well as the honorific system. This provides meaningful points of comparison not only at the grammatical level but also from a sociolinguistic perspective. This contrastive analysis is expected to help Uzbek-speaking learners of Korean better understand the omission and substitution of Korean possessive markers, and conversely, to provide Korean speakers with foundational materials for learning the system of Uzbek possessive suffixes

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18509641
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POSSESSIVE CASE SUFFIXES IN KOREAN AND UZBEK

Lee Ji-won
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POSSESSIVE CASE SUFFIXES IN KOREAN AND UZBEK

Lee Ji-won
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes possessive suffixes in Korean and Uzbek from a contrastive linguistic perspective. The purpose of the study is to examine typological and pragmatic differences between the two languages. In Korean, possession is expressed by attaching -ui to a noun, but in actual spoken usage it is often omitted or replaced, and in many cases possession is determined by the conversational context. In contrast, Uzbek expresses possession through grammatical possessive suffixes according to person, such as -im, -ing, -i, -miz, -ingiz, and -lari, which clearly reflect the characteristics of an agglutinative language. Furthermore, in both Korean and Uzbek, possessive expressions show various pragmatic variations depending on factors such as the social relationship and degree of familiarity between the speaker and the listener, as well as the honorific system. This provides meaningful points of comparison not only at the grammatical level but also from a sociolinguistic perspective. This contrastive analysis is expected to help Uzbek-speaking learners of Korean better understand the omission and substitution of Korean possessive markers, and conversely, to provide Korean speakers with foundational materials for learning the system of Uzbek possessive suffixes

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POSSESSIVE CASE SUFFIXES IN KOREAN AND UZBEK — Lee Ji-won · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS