Who Is The Author?

Abstract: This article begins by examining the issue of authorship in classical Greek and medieval exegetical literary cultures and then proceeds to explore the tendencies that point to the ‘disappearance’ of the author in nineteenth-century literary studies. It continues by focusing on Barthes’s and Foucault’s theories of authorship, which inspired a seminal postmodern belief: that the subject (author) is a fictional emanation of language and writing, which subvert all attempts by the human agent to be the source of action. Then relying on John Zizioulas and Christos Yannaras, the article highlights the ontological interpretation of the person given by the so-called Cappadocians: Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa. Based on the ontological understanding of the person as freedom, this article concludes by proving its hypothesis that the author is, in fact, a person and a hypostatic-ecstatic being as well as that a literary work is a reflection of personal character, not a mere tissue of quotations or intertext. On the contrary, it is always the work of a specific author.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Christianity & Literature
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/chy.2025.a982265
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Is The Author?

Krešimir Šimić
Christianity & Literature
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Who Is The Author?

Krešimir Šimić
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article begins by examining the issue of authorship in classical Greek and medieval exegetical literary cultures and then proceeds to explore the tendencies that point to the ‘disappearance’ of the author in nineteenth-century literary studies. It continues by focusing on Barthes’s and Foucault’s theories of authorship, which inspired a seminal postmodern belief: that the subject (author) is a fictional emanation of language and writing, which subvert all attempts by the human agent to be the source of action. Then relying on John Zizioulas and Christos Yannaras, the article highlights the ontological interpretation of the person given by the so-called Cappadocians: Basil the Great, Gregory of Nazianzus, and Gregory of Nyssa. Based on the ontological understanding of the person as freedom, this article concludes by proving its hypothesis that the author is, in fact, a person and a hypostatic-ecstatic being as well as that a literary work is a reflection of personal character, not a mere tissue of quotations or intertext. On the contrary, it is always the work of a specific author.

Christianity & LiteratureVol. 74(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.