Industry versus firm effects on dividend policy: Evidence from privately held SMEs

Dividend policy in privately held firms is driven by factors that change from year to year (for example, size, profitability), by characteristics that are stable over longer periods (for example, ownership structure), and by industry factors. However, the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated how different levels of analysis-dynamic year-on-year variation, stable firm-level characteristics, and industry level-contribute to privately held small- and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) dividend policy and how much of the variance in dividend policy can be attributed to each level. To address these questions, we used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), a variance decomposition technique, to assess the contributions of each level to SMEs' dividend policy. Analyzing data from 64,928 Belgian SMEs between 2015 and 2022, we found that industry factors exert minimal influence, while dynamic year-on-year changes and stable firm-level characteristics account for the largest share of the variance in dividend policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Small Business Management
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2026.2615675
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industry versus firm effects on dividend policy: Evidence from privately held SMEs

Jovana Cadenovic, Leentje Moortgat, Ine Paeleman, Marc Deloof
Journal of Small Business Management
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Industry versus firm effects on dividend policy: Evidence from privately held SMEs

Jovana Cadenovic, Leentje Moortgat, Ine Paeleman, Marc Deloof
article en

Abstract

Dividend policy in privately held firms is driven by factors that change from year to year (for example, size, profitability), by characteristics that are stable over longer periods (for example, ownership structure), and by industry factors. However, the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated how different levels of analysis-dynamic year-on-year variation, stable firm-level characteristics, and industry level-contribute to privately held small- and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) dividend policy and how much of the variance in dividend policy can be attributed to each level. To address these questions, we used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), a variance decomposition technique, to assess the contributions of each level to SMEs' dividend policy. Analyzing data from 64,928 Belgian SMEs between 2015 and 2022, we found that industry factors exert minimal influence, while dynamic year-on-year changes and stable firm-level characteristics account for the largest share of the variance in dividend policy.

Journal of Small Business Management
University of Antwerp (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Antwerp Management School (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Industry versus firm effects on dividend policy: Evidence from privately held SMEs — Jovana Cadenovic, Leentje Moortgat, et al. · Journal of Small Business Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS