Silvopastoral system versus unwooded pastures: changing the mindset to combine animal welfare and profitable performance in cattle farming

Abstract Tropical zones currently produce the majority of the world’s agricultural food; however, their thermal environment poses a challenge to animals. In this context, silvopastoral systems (SPS) have been proposed to provide animals with milder microclimates owing to their shaded areas. To evaluate the impact of the silvopastoral system on the behavior, gonadosomatic development, and endocrine profile of young beef bulls, as well as to relate these characteristics to thermal comfort conditions across different seasons. Conducted over 13 months in a high-altitude tropical area in Brazil, the study involved 40 beef bulls (10.5±1.9 months; 222.5±34.5 kg BW), divided into full sun (FS; n=20) and SPS (n=20). Weather stations measured bioclimatic variables, and electronic collars permanently monitored animal behavior. Monthly measurements included hormonal profiles, live weight, and scrotal circumference. Statistical analyses used a mixed linear model (α=5%).SPS provided a milder microclimate, enhancing thermal comfort ( P <0.05). The system influenced the time spent walking and resting ( P <0.05). Bulls in FS ruminated longer at night and in the early morning than in SPS. Even in hotter seasons, FS bulls walked more than those in SPS ( P <0.05). Serum cortisol and testosterone levels were similar between groups; however, FS bulls had higher serum T3 levels ( P <0.05) without significant anabolic effects. Both groups showed similar live weight and scrotal circumference development. SPS fosters a more favorable microclimate, improving animal welfare and behavior while maintaining productive traits, suggesting its potential to enhance the resilience of production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-026-01442-6
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silvopastoral system versus unwooded pastures: changing the mindset to combine animal welfare and profitable performance in cattle farming

Lívia Ferreira Pinho, Mariana Jucá Moraes, Felipe Zandonadi Brandão, Felipe Tonato et al.
Agroforestry Systems
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

Silvopastoral system versus unwooded pastures: changing the mindset to combine animal welfare and profitable performance in cattle farming

Lívia Ferreira Pinho, Mariana Jucá Moraes, Felipe Zandonadi Brandão, Felipe Tonato, Giovanna Galhardo Ramos, Erick Fonseca de Castilho, A. Garcia, Andréa do Nascimento Barreto, André de Faria Pedroso, José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tropical zones currently produce the majority of the world’s agricultural food; however, their thermal environment poses a challenge to animals. In this context, silvopastoral systems (SPS) have been proposed to provide animals with milder microclimates owing to their shaded areas. To evaluate the impact of the silvopastoral system on the behavior, gonadosomatic development, and endocrine profile of young beef bulls, as well as to relate these characteristics to thermal comfort conditions across different seasons. Conducted over 13 months in a high-altitude tropical area in Brazil, the study involved 40 beef bulls (10.5±1.9 months; 222.5±34.5 kg BW), divided into full sun (FS; n=20) and SPS (n=20). Weather stations measured bioclimatic variables, and electronic collars permanently monitored animal behavior. Monthly measurements included hormonal profiles, live weight, and scrotal circumference. Statistical analyses used a mixed linear model (α=5%).SPS provided a milder microclimate, enhancing thermal comfort ( P <0.05). The system influenced the time spent walking and resting ( P <0.05). Bulls in FS ruminated longer at night and in the early morning than in SPS. Even in hotter seasons, FS bulls walked more than those in SPS ( P <0.05). Serum cortisol and testosterone levels were similar between groups; however, FS bulls had higher serum T3 levels ( P <0.05) without significant anabolic effects. Both groups showed similar live weight and scrotal circumference development. SPS fosters a more favorable microclimate, improving animal welfare and behavior while maintaining productive traits, suggesting its potential to enhance the resilience of production systems.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 100(2)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.