Evaluation of morphological variations of mandibular bone in adult bruxers using CBCT: A cross-sectional study

This cross-sectional study aimed to establish whether a difference exists between the mandibular bone density and the mandibular angle values of adult bruxer and non-bruxer patients, based on a CBCT analysis. CBCT scans of bruxer and non-bruxer patients were analysed with two software packages, 3D Slicer® and Romexis®. Bone density in the alveolar bone below and immediately adjacent to the apices of teeth 31, 33, 34, 41, 43, 44, and the mesial apices of teeth 36 and 46, was recorded in Hounsfield units with 3D Slicer®. The mandibular angle between the corpus and ramus tangent lines was measured using Romexis® software. 113 CBCT scans were included in the study of alveolar bone density, of which 78 were used to study mandibular angle values. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between the density values of the two groups, with higher values in bruxers than in non-bruxers. Mandibular angle values were significantly lower in bruxers (p < 0.05). This cross-sectional study based on CBCT imaging showed certain morphological differences between the mandibles of bruxers and those of non-bruxers. Further studies are needed to supplement this preliminary research, in particular prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342472
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of morphological variations of mandibular bone in adult bruxers using CBCT: A cross-sectional study

Benoit Ballester, Camille Philip-Alliez, Anne RASKIN, Estelle Casazza et al.
PLoS ONE
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Evaluation of morphological variations of mandibular bone in adult bruxers using CBCT: A cross-sectional study

Benoit Ballester, Camille Philip-Alliez, Anne RASKIN, Estelle Casazza, Clémence Vernet
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to establish whether a difference exists between the mandibular bone density and the mandibular angle values of adult bruxer and non-bruxer patients, based on a CBCT analysis. CBCT scans of bruxer and non-bruxer patients were analysed with two software packages, 3D Slicer® and Romexis®. Bone density in the alveolar bone below and immediately adjacent to the apices of teeth 31, 33, 34, 41, 43, 44, and the mesial apices of teeth 36 and 46, was recorded in Hounsfield units with 3D Slicer®. The mandibular angle between the corpus and ramus tangent lines was measured using Romexis® software. 113 CBCT scans were included in the study of alveolar bone density, of which 78 were used to study mandibular angle values. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between the density values of the two groups, with higher values in bruxers than in non-bruxers. Mandibular angle values were significantly lower in bruxers (p < 0.05). This cross-sectional study based on CBCT imaging showed certain morphological differences between the mandibles of bruxers and those of non-bruxers. Further studies are needed to supplement this preliminary research, in particular prospective studies.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Délégation Provence et Corse (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Economic & Social Sciences, Health Systems & Medical Informatics (FR), Hôpital de la Timone (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.