The regulatory cost burden on Atlantic coast shellfish farms

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to measure the economic effects of regulations on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, specifically to (1) measure the total regulatory cost burden on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, (2) measure the value of lost revenue resulting from regulatory action, and (3) compare economic effects of the regulatory framework across Atlantic coast states and farm sizes. Methods We conducted a survey of shellfish producers in Atlantic coast states (Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia) in 2019–2022. The survey elicited detailed farm information on the farm-level regulatory compliance burden, production and marketing costs, sales, and revenue lost from regulations. There were 82 total respondents, a 6% response rate, and a coverage rate of 31% that varied from 9% to 77% across states. Results The aggregated regulatory costs on Atlantic coast shellfish farms were US$7.5 million (2023 value), 7% of total farm costs, and 4% of total farm sales and averaged $28,849 per farm. Total lost revenue (from lost production and markets and thwarted expansion attempts) was $9.4 million (2023 value), of which 89% was from thwarted expansion attempts. Small-scale farms had disproportionately greater negative economic effects than larger-scale farms, largely because the majority of regulatory costs were fixed costs that increased the magnitude of economies of scale on Atlantic coast shellfish farms. Regulations were ranked as the greatest challenge on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, of which shellfish sanitation (i.e., food safety) and legal costs associated with permitting and lease approval were the greatest costs. Interpretation of state-specific results and comparisons should consider the low response and coverage rates in some states in this study. Conclusions Farm-level survey data revealed that the regulatory framework for shellfish producers on the Atlantic coast has increased the costs of production, restricted access to markets, and prevented producers from expanding production to meet market demand. Streamlining the permit and leasing application processes to reduce redundancy, developing more efficient reporting systems that reduce duplication, and addressing user conflicts more effectively in coastal areas would likely improve the economic sustainability of Atlantic coast shellfish farms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Aquaculture
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/naaqua/vraf039
Primary Topic
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The regulatory cost burden on Atlantic coast shellfish farms

Jonathan van Senten, C. Jr. Clark, Carole R. Engle
North American Journal of Aquaculture
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
article

The regulatory cost burden on Atlantic coast shellfish farms

Jonathan van Senten, C. Jr. Clark, Carole R. Engle
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective The objective of this study was to measure the economic effects of regulations on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, specifically to (1) measure the total regulatory cost burden on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, (2) measure the value of lost revenue resulting from regulatory action, and (3) compare economic effects of the regulatory framework across Atlantic coast states and farm sizes. Methods We conducted a survey of shellfish producers in Atlantic coast states (Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia) in 2019–2022. The survey elicited detailed farm information on the farm-level regulatory compliance burden, production and marketing costs, sales, and revenue lost from regulations. There were 82 total respondents, a 6% response rate, and a coverage rate of 31% that varied from 9% to 77% across states. Results The aggregated regulatory costs on Atlantic coast shellfish farms were US$7.5 million (2023 value), 7% of total farm costs, and 4% of total farm sales and averaged $28,849 per farm. Total lost revenue (from lost production and markets and thwarted expansion attempts) was $9.4 million (2023 value), of which 89% was from thwarted expansion attempts. Small-scale farms had disproportionately greater negative economic effects than larger-scale farms, largely because the majority of regulatory costs were fixed costs that increased the magnitude of economies of scale on Atlantic coast shellfish farms. Regulations were ranked as the greatest challenge on Atlantic coast shellfish farms, of which shellfish sanitation (i.e., food safety) and legal costs associated with permitting and lease approval were the greatest costs. Interpretation of state-specific results and comparisons should consider the low response and coverage rates in some states in this study. Conclusions Farm-level survey data revealed that the regulatory framework for shellfish producers on the Atlantic coast has increased the costs of production, restricted access to markets, and prevented producers from expanding production to meet market demand. Streamlining the permit and leasing application processes to reduce redundancy, developing more efficient reporting systems that reduce duplication, and addressing user conflicts more effectively in coastal areas would likely improve the economic sustainability of Atlantic coast shellfish farms.

North American Journal of Aquaculture
Aquatic Systems (United States) (US), Virginia Sea Grant (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.