Explaining Productivity Differences Among Tree Species via Biotic and Abiotic Factors

Greenhouse gases emitted by humans have exacerbated global climate change. Forests can effectively sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, and afforestation has been widely adopted worldwide to mitigate climate change. <i>Cunninghamia lanceolata</i> and <i>Pinus massoniana</i>, as major afforestation tree species, are extensively cultivated in southern China. However, the mechanisms by which climate, topography, biodiversity, forest structure, and forest growth status affect the productivity of these two species remain unclear. This study used forest inventory data from Lishui City combining the Biomod2 model with a structural equation model (SEM) to investigate the differential effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the productivity of the two tree species. The results showed that at the same diameter at breast height (DBH), the biomass of <i>P. massoniana</i> reached 384.67 kg, accounting for 188.75% of that of <i>C. lanceolata</i> (211.07 kg). The dominant climatic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> and <i>P. massoniana</i> were different; the most important climatic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> were Bio 17, Bio 15, Bio 05, Bio 08, and Bio 02, while those affecting <i>P. massoniana</i> were Bio 18, Bio 04, and Bio 01. Furthermore, the explanatory power of the structural equation model (SEM) optimized by the Biomod2 model was effectively improved. Biodiversity and forest growth factors were the most important biotic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while structural diversity and forest growth factors were the most important biotic factors affecting <i>P. massoniana</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Biodiversity and structural diversity exerted divergent effects on <i>C. lanceolata</i> and <i>P. massoniana</i> in different growth stages, exerting negative effects in the early growth stage and positive effects in the late growth stage. These outcomes were jointly driven by the selection effect and niche complementarity. This study recommends the forest management practices should select tree species based on local conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020277
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining Productivity Differences Among Tree Species via Biotic and Abiotic Factors

Huajing Song, Li Ma, Kai Chen, Liyang Tong et al.
Life
Forest ecology and management
article

Explaining Productivity Differences Among Tree Species via Biotic and Abiotic Factors

Huajing Song, Li Ma, Kai Chen, Liyang Tong, Lijin Wang, Xiahuan Zhan, Kai Wang
article en

Abstract

Greenhouse gases emitted by humans have exacerbated global climate change. Forests can effectively sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, and afforestation has been widely adopted worldwide to mitigate climate change. <i>Cunninghamia lanceolata</i> and <i>Pinus massoniana</i>, as major afforestation tree species, are extensively cultivated in southern China. However, the mechanisms by which climate, topography, biodiversity, forest structure, and forest growth status affect the productivity of these two species remain unclear. This study used forest inventory data from Lishui City combining the Biomod2 model with a structural equation model (SEM) to investigate the differential effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the productivity of the two tree species. The results showed that at the same diameter at breast height (DBH), the biomass of <i>P. massoniana</i> reached 384.67 kg, accounting for 188.75% of that of <i>C. lanceolata</i> (211.07 kg). The dominant climatic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> and <i>P. massoniana</i> were different; the most important climatic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> were Bio 17, Bio 15, Bio 05, Bio 08, and Bio 02, while those affecting <i>P. massoniana</i> were Bio 18, Bio 04, and Bio 01. Furthermore, the explanatory power of the structural equation model (SEM) optimized by the Biomod2 model was effectively improved. Biodiversity and forest growth factors were the most important biotic factors affecting <i>C. lanceolata</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while structural diversity and forest growth factors were the most important biotic factors affecting <i>P. massoniana</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Biodiversity and structural diversity exerted divergent effects on <i>C. lanceolata</i> and <i>P. massoniana</i> in different growth stages, exerting negative effects in the early growth stage and positive effects in the late growth stage. These outcomes were jointly driven by the selection effect and niche complementarity. This study recommends the forest management practices should select tree species based on local conditions.

LifeVol. 16(2)
Lishui University (CN), Lishui Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.