Core outcome set in vitiligo: perspectives from the frontline of research and publishing. What do trialists and editors of five leading dermatology journals really think?
The World Health Organization, in its Guidance for Best Practices for Clinical Trials, recently emphasized the adoption of a core outcome set (COS) to promote standardization and transparency in trial reporting. A core outcome domain set (CODS) is a crucial first step before developing a COS, as it defines the key areas or domains that should be measured. Despite previous attempts, CODS/COS for vitiligo clinical trials are still not widely used. To explore barriers and facilitators to implementing the vitiligo CODS, we conducted two complementary surveys. The first targeted corresponding authors of vitiligo randomized controlled trials and the second survey invited Editors-in-Chief of five leading dermatological journals.
Authors
- Viktoria Eleftheriadou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-1466)
- Ezzedine Khaled
- Shahnawaz Towheed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8349-8039)
- Henry Lim
- Sanna C A C Prinsen
- Christina Nikoletopoulou
Institutions
- Henry Ford Health System (US)
- Inserm (FR)
- Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
- New Cross Hospital (GB)
- University College Birmingham (GB)
- Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor (FR)
- Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Published
- 2026-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljag024
- Primary Topic
- Delphi Technique in Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00