Unraveling Microstructural and Macrostructural Brain Age Dynamics in Multiple Sclerosis

Background and objectives: In multiple sclerosis (MS), neurodegeneration results from the interplay between disease-specific pathology and normal aging. Conventional MRI captures morphologic changes in neurodegeneration, while quantitative MRI (qMRI) provides biophysical measures of microstructural alterations. Combining these modalities may reveal how aging and pathology interact and contribute to disability progression in people with MS. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional and longitudinal morphometry data from 1,353 patients with MS and 3,462 healthy controls (HCs). In addition, cross-sectional qMRI data, available for 378 HCs and 169 patients with MS, were analyzed separately. Morphometric measures and quantitative metrics were used to estimate brain-predicted age differences (brain-PADs) with machine learning. We assessed the added value of quantitative metrics over a model based exclusively on morphometric measures in brain age prediction. We also investigated the associations of brain-PADs derived from conventional and qMRI-based predictive models with clinical disability, serum inflammatory biomarkers of neuroaxonal and astrocytic injury, and lesion burden. Discussion: Integrating qMRI improves brain age predictions. Brain-PAD serves as an imaging biomarker to quantify MS-associated aging and track disability and neuroinflammation progression.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-290987
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling Microstructural and Macrostructural Brain Age Dynamics in Multiple Sclerosis

Sabine Schädelin, Michael Diepers, Willeke M. Menks, P.-F. Lu et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Unraveling Microstructural and Macrostructural Brain Age Dynamics in Multiple Sclerosis

Sabine Schädelin, Michael Diepers, Willeke M. Menks, P.-F. Lu, Kwok‐Shing Chan, Matthias Weigel, Clara Ekerdt, Renaud Du Pasquier, Sebastian Finkener, Johanna Oechtering, Pascal Benkert, Marcus D'Souza, Alessandro Cagol, Xinjie Chen, ET AL (the CMS ECAL Group), Özgür Yaldizli, Marcel Zwiers, Claire Bridel, Esther Ruberte, Patrick Roth, Mario Ocampo-Pineda, Federico Spagnolo, Caroline Pot, Tobias J. Derfuss, David Leppert, Andrew Chan, Robert Hoepner, Patrice H. Lalive, Johanna Maria Lieb
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: In multiple sclerosis (MS), neurodegeneration results from the interplay between disease-specific pathology and normal aging. Conventional MRI captures morphologic changes in neurodegeneration, while quantitative MRI (qMRI) provides biophysical measures of microstructural alterations. Combining these modalities may reveal how aging and pathology interact and contribute to disability progression in people with MS. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional and longitudinal morphometry data from 1,353 patients with MS and 3,462 healthy controls (HCs). In addition, cross-sectional qMRI data, available for 378 HCs and 169 patients with MS, were analyzed separately. Morphometric measures and quantitative metrics were used to estimate brain-predicted age differences (brain-PADs) with machine learning. We assessed the added value of quantitative metrics over a model based exclusively on morphometric measures in brain age prediction. We also investigated the associations of brain-PADs derived from conventional and qMRI-based predictive models with clinical disability, serum inflammatory biomarkers of neuroaxonal and astrocytic injury, and lesion burden. Discussion: Integrating qMRI improves brain age predictions. Brain-PAD serves as an imaging biomarker to quantify MS-associated aging and track disability and neuroinflammation progression.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.