Re-evaluating post-polypectomy surveillance: The role of non-invasive modalities in colorectal cancer prevention

Post-polypectomy surveillance is a cornerstone of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention, yet current reliance on colonoscopy poses challenges related to capacity, patient burden, and adherence. Amid growing interest in non-invasive strategies, this review evaluates the diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and limitations of emerging alternatives, including faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), CT colonography (CTC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), in the context of post-polypectomy surveillance. While FIT remains widely endorsed for low-risk populations, its limited sensitivity for flat adenomas and serrated lesions constrains its utility. mt-sDNA and CTC offer incremental improvements in detection but face cost-effectiveness, false-positive, and guideline limitations in surveillance. ctDNA holds promise for recurrence monitoring in high-risk CRC but remains investigational for adenoma surveillance. Evidence for CCE as a triage tool is emerging, though concerns persist regarding incomplete examinations, cost, and residual risk. Importantly, substantial heterogeneity in surveillance guidelines and suboptimal real-world adherence complicate evaluation and implementation of these modalities. Integration of molecular biomarkers and risk-adaptive strategies may support more personalised follow-up. However, robust comparative effectiveness studies that account for system-level and behavioural factors are essential to guide appropriate adoption. Non-invasive tools remain complementary, not yet replacements, for colonoscopy in post-polypectomy care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2026.102092
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-evaluating post-polypectomy surveillance: The role of non-invasive modalities in colorectal cancer prevention

Mark Lawler, Stephen T. McSorley, Ethna McFerran, Damian McKay et al.
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Re-evaluating post-polypectomy surveillance: The role of non-invasive modalities in colorectal cancer prevention

Mark Lawler, Stephen T. McSorley, Ethna McFerran, Damian McKay, Maurice B. Loughrey
article en

Abstract

Post-polypectomy surveillance is a cornerstone of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention, yet current reliance on colonoscopy poses challenges related to capacity, patient burden, and adherence. Amid growing interest in non-invasive strategies, this review evaluates the diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and limitations of emerging alternatives, including faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), CT colonography (CTC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), in the context of post-polypectomy surveillance. While FIT remains widely endorsed for low-risk populations, its limited sensitivity for flat adenomas and serrated lesions constrains its utility. mt-sDNA and CTC offer incremental improvements in detection but face cost-effectiveness, false-positive, and guideline limitations in surveillance. ctDNA holds promise for recurrence monitoring in high-risk CRC but remains investigational for adenoma surveillance. Evidence for CCE as a triage tool is emerging, though concerns persist regarding incomplete examinations, cost, and residual risk. Importantly, substantial heterogeneity in surveillance guidelines and suboptimal real-world adherence complicate evaluation and implementation of these modalities. Integration of molecular biomarkers and risk-adaptive strategies may support more personalised follow-up. However, robust comparative effectiveness studies that account for system-level and behavioural factors are essential to guide appropriate adoption. Non-invasive tools remain complementary, not yet replacements, for colonoscopy in post-polypectomy care.

Best Practice & Research Clinical GastroenterologyVol. 80
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Gilead Sciences, Bowel Cancer UK, Ipsen, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.