Narrative Horizons: Deliberate Derangement in Oceanic Climate Fiction

ABSTRACT Although we live in the Anthropocene—the geological age of humankind, wherein humans have measurably impacted the biosphere—we struggle to narrate the Anthropocene. In particular, we struggle to give narrative shape to its foremost feature: anthropogenic climate change. Describing the limits of storytelling in the era of human‐driven climate change, both David Wallace‐Wells and Amitav Ghosh identify a “failure of imagination” in popular media. Ghosh defines our age as one of “derangement”—i.e., a distorted, anthropocentric worldview characterized by “modes of concealment” at odds with our supposed ecological self‐awareness. Literature often enables such derangement, and many critics have taken fiction to task over its inability to narrate the climate crisis. In my article, I conversely suggest the generative possibilities of derangement in climate‐minded fiction. I analyze how certain texts make narrative fodder out of our “failure of imagination,” telling human‐centered stories about our inability to tell nonhuman stories—a process of representation and reception I call deliberate derangement . I focus on a pair of climate fictions set around bodies of water: A. S. Byatt's “Sea Story” (2013) and Vajra Chandrasekera's “Half‐Eaten Cities” (2018). I argue that these two cli‐fi short stories explicitly embrace and enact “modes of concealment” in order to call attention to the barriers and boundaries that impede humanity's ecological imagination. This deliberate derangement occurs via human encounters with the material and symbolic waters of the ocean, a planetary‐scale nonhuman entity whose presence and agency highlights the limits of a human‐centered worldview. By actively foregrounding literal (and littoral), cognitive, and narrative horizons, this pair of oceanic cli‐fi texts seek to show us the Anthropocene by not showing us the Anthropocene. What results is an uncanny presence‐in‐absence—a haunting reminder of our deranged, limited awareness of the more‐than‐human world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Humanities
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fhu2.70025
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative Horizons: Deliberate Derangement in Oceanic Climate Fiction

Mark Celeste
Future Humanities
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Narrative Horizons: Deliberate Derangement in Oceanic Climate Fiction

Mark Celeste
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although we live in the Anthropocene—the geological age of humankind, wherein humans have measurably impacted the biosphere—we struggle to narrate the Anthropocene. In particular, we struggle to give narrative shape to its foremost feature: anthropogenic climate change. Describing the limits of storytelling in the era of human‐driven climate change, both David Wallace‐Wells and Amitav Ghosh identify a “failure of imagination” in popular media. Ghosh defines our age as one of “derangement”—i.e., a distorted, anthropocentric worldview characterized by “modes of concealment” at odds with our supposed ecological self‐awareness. Literature often enables such derangement, and many critics have taken fiction to task over its inability to narrate the climate crisis. In my article, I conversely suggest the generative possibilities of derangement in climate‐minded fiction. I analyze how certain texts make narrative fodder out of our “failure of imagination,” telling human‐centered stories about our inability to tell nonhuman stories—a process of representation and reception I call deliberate derangement . I focus on a pair of climate fictions set around bodies of water: A. S. Byatt's “Sea Story” (2013) and Vajra Chandrasekera's “Half‐Eaten Cities” (2018). I argue that these two cli‐fi short stories explicitly embrace and enact “modes of concealment” in order to call attention to the barriers and boundaries that impede humanity's ecological imagination. This deliberate derangement occurs via human encounters with the material and symbolic waters of the ocean, a planetary‐scale nonhuman entity whose presence and agency highlights the limits of a human‐centered worldview. By actively foregrounding literal (and littoral), cognitive, and narrative horizons, this pair of oceanic cli‐fi texts seek to show us the Anthropocene by not showing us the Anthropocene. What results is an uncanny presence‐in‐absence—a haunting reminder of our deranged, limited awareness of the more‐than‐human world.

Future HumanitiesVol. 4(1)
Hampden–Sydney College (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Narrative Horizons: Deliberate Derangement in Oceanic Climate Fiction — Mark Celeste · Future Humanities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS