We Want a Republic! A Comparative Analysis of Criticism of Monarchy in Denmark, Norway and Sweden

Denmark, Norway and Sweden are Scandinavian monarchies. Although monarchs in Scandinavia and royal families are generally respected, they do draw criticism. This article examines the anti-monarchy arguments used by Scandinavian republicans – first, monarchy as an anti-democratic; second, as a despotic; third, as an antiquated mode of rule; and, finally, as an imposing a financial burden on the state. In the research two questions were posed: Do Danish, Norwegian and Swedish republicans share anti-monarchy arguments?; Do republicans, on the contrary, represent contrasting systems of values regarding monarchy? The hypothesis stipulates that Scandinavian republicans present very similar arguments, and that their rhetoric revolves around “discussing” rather than “taking action” to replace the monarch with a president. Study applies critical and comparative analysis and critical literature analysis to the sources, which include literature on the monarchy as well as anti- monarchists’ online sources and legal documents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio K – Politologia
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2025.32.2.45-60
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

We Want a Republic! A Comparative Analysis of Criticism of Monarchy in Denmark, Norway and Sweden

Barbara Joanna Bieniek
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio K – Politologia
Political Systems and Governance
article

We Want a Republic! A Comparative Analysis of Criticism of Monarchy in Denmark, Norway and Sweden

Barbara Joanna Bieniek
article en

Abstract

Denmark, Norway and Sweden are Scandinavian monarchies. Although monarchs in Scandinavia and royal families are generally respected, they do draw criticism. This article examines the anti-monarchy arguments used by Scandinavian republicans – first, monarchy as an anti-democratic; second, as a despotic; third, as an antiquated mode of rule; and, finally, as an imposing a financial burden on the state. In the research two questions were posed: Do Danish, Norwegian and Swedish republicans share anti-monarchy arguments?; Do republicans, on the contrary, represent contrasting systems of values regarding monarchy? The hypothesis stipulates that Scandinavian republicans present very similar arguments, and that their rhetoric revolves around “discussing” rather than “taking action” to replace the monarch with a president. Study applies critical and comparative analysis and critical literature analysis to the sources, which include literature on the monarchy as well as anti- monarchists’ online sources and legal documents.

Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio K – PolitologiaVol. 32(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

We Want a Republic! A Comparative Analysis of Criticism of Monarchy in Denmark, Norway and Sweden — Barbara Joanna Bieniek · Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska sectio K – Politologia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS