3526 Analysis of cases and outcomes from GPwSI working concurrently cross-specialty in acute frailty and specialist palliative care

Abstract Background During the period September to December 2024 an individual GPwSI was working across specialist palliative care (0.2WTE) and acute frailty (0.6WTE) concurrently within the same Trust. To allow Specialist Palliative Care consultants to concentrate on ward/inpatient/complex cases, the GPwSI saw a variety of patients where the CNS felt a doctor was needed with unclear or undifferentiated problems. Method We analysed the case mix and outcomes of 38 cases seen, demonstrating that cross-speciality working has positive outcomes for doctors, patients and services and reduces acute admissions. Results Of the 38 cases analysed, 71% were home visits (patient’s usual place of residence), 24% originated as cases identified as needed cross-specialty input whilst the GPwSI was working in ED/SDEC, and 5% were at the hospice/telephone. Over a third (34%) of patient contacts involved patients with non-cancer or frailty related symptoms. Outcomes of the visits varied widely—some were advice only, in two cases GPwSI and CNS administered anticipatory medications, most were referred on to other services e.g. Rapid Response, hospice inpatient unit, Frailty SDEC (Same Day Emergency Care). Patients were seen within 1–2 days on Frailty SDEC by the Frailty team (including GPwSI) for presentations that would otherwise likely have resulted in ED attendances or hospital admissions. At least 37% (up to 50%) of these contacts resulted in >1 ED attendances/admissions avoided through cross-specialty/sector working—some were seen multiple times in Frailty SDEC for follow up and prevention of crises. Presentations included deranged electrolytes, anaemia, infection, ascites. The 24% of cases seen in ED also involved more direct and rapid input from palliative care including inpatient hospice. Conclusion This cross specialty integrated method of working was highly successful in admission avoidance in those approaching the end of life, achievement of patient goals (PPC/PPD) and patient satisfaction. Staff also reported high impact of this way cross-sector working.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.041
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3526 Analysis of cases and outcomes from GPwSI working concurrently cross-specialty in acute frailty and specialist palliative care

A Down
Age and Ageing
Frailty in Older Adults
article

3526 Analysis of cases and outcomes from GPwSI working concurrently cross-specialty in acute frailty and specialist palliative care

A Down
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background During the period September to December 2024 an individual GPwSI was working across specialist palliative care (0.2WTE) and acute frailty (0.6WTE) concurrently within the same Trust. To allow Specialist Palliative Care consultants to concentrate on ward/inpatient/complex cases, the GPwSI saw a variety of patients where the CNS felt a doctor was needed with unclear or undifferentiated problems. Method We analysed the case mix and outcomes of 38 cases seen, demonstrating that cross-speciality working has positive outcomes for doctors, patients and services and reduces acute admissions. Results Of the 38 cases analysed, 71% were home visits (patient’s usual place of residence), 24% originated as cases identified as needed cross-specialty input whilst the GPwSI was working in ED/SDEC, and 5% were at the hospice/telephone. Over a third (34%) of patient contacts involved patients with non-cancer or frailty related symptoms. Outcomes of the visits varied widely—some were advice only, in two cases GPwSI and CNS administered anticipatory medications, most were referred on to other services e.g. Rapid Response, hospice inpatient unit, Frailty SDEC (Same Day Emergency Care). Patients were seen within 1–2 days on Frailty SDEC by the Frailty team (including GPwSI) for presentations that would otherwise likely have resulted in ED attendances or hospital admissions. At least 37% (up to 50%) of these contacts resulted in >1 ED attendances/admissions avoided through cross-specialty/sector working—some were seen multiple times in Frailty SDEC for follow up and prevention of crises. Presentations included deranged electrolytes, anaemia, infection, ascites. The 24% of cases seen in ED also involved more direct and rapid input from palliative care including inpatient hospice. Conclusion This cross specialty integrated method of working was highly successful in admission avoidance in those approaching the end of life, achievement of patient goals (PPC/PPD) and patient satisfaction. Staff also reported high impact of this way cross-sector working.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Ealing Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.