Computational and Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Legislative Networks: New Zealand’s Mental Health Act as a Case Study

This paper presents a computational framework for constructing and analysing a focal legislative citation network. A depth-limited expansion strategy generates subgraphs of the network that capture the local structural environment of a seed Act while avoiding the global hub dominance present in whole-corpus analyses. Centrality measures and community detection show how the seed Act’s perceived influence changes with network radius. To incorporate semantic information, we develop and apply an Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted topic modelling method in which representative keywords and LLM-generated summaries form a compact text representation that is converted into a Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF–IDF) document–term matrix. Although demonstrated on New Zealand’s mental health legislation, the framework generalises to any legislative corpus or jurisdiction. Integrating graph-theoretic structure with LLM-assisted semantic modelling provides a scalable approach for analysing legislative systems, identifying domain-specific clusters, and supporting computational studies of legal evolution and policy impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17020161
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational and Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Legislative Networks: New Zealand’s Mental Health Act as a Case Study

Iman Ardekani, Sewmini Dananji Gunawardhana, Neda Sakhaee, Maryam Ildoromi et al.
Information
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Computational and Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Legislative Networks: New Zealand’s Mental Health Act as a Case Study

Iman Ardekani, Sewmini Dananji Gunawardhana, Neda Sakhaee, Maryam Ildoromi, Parmida Raeis
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a computational framework for constructing and analysing a focal legislative citation network. A depth-limited expansion strategy generates subgraphs of the network that capture the local structural environment of a seed Act while avoiding the global hub dominance present in whole-corpus analyses. Centrality measures and community detection show how the seed Act’s perceived influence changes with network radius. To incorporate semantic information, we develop and apply an Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted topic modelling method in which representative keywords and LLM-generated summaries form a compact text representation that is converted into a Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF–IDF) document–term matrix. Although demonstrated on New Zealand’s mental health legislation, the framework generalises to any legislative corpus or jurisdiction. Integrating graph-theoretic structure with LLM-assisted semantic modelling provides a scalable approach for analysing legislative systems, identifying domain-specific clusters, and supporting computational studies of legal evolution and policy impact.

InformationVol. 17(2)
University of Auckland (NZ), Unitec Institute of Technology (NZ), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computational and Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Legislative Networks: New Zealand’s Mental Health Act as a Case Study — Iman Ardekani, Sewmini Dananji Gunawardhana, et al. · Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS