Optimizing peer review rounds in radiation oncology: a scoping review
This scoping review reveals the lack of work on innovative approaches to optimize PR rounds in RO, despite the commonly reported participation barrier of high time commitment. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating automation in order to streamline facilitation methods and tools such as checklists to reduce inefficiency, given PR's essential role in patient safety and clinical learning. Future research should prioritize the development and evaluation of time-saving strategies and tools for PR in RO workflow to optimize its sustainability and impact.
Authors
- Sangjune Laurence Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-8109)
- Jessica Zhang
- Marcus Vaska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-3213)
- Conrad Bayley
Institutions
- Alberta Health Services (CA)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Oncology
- Published
- 2026-02-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1686796
- Primary Topic
- Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00