Governance mechanisms and social responsibility performance in international megaprojects: the contingent role of host country institutional environment

Purpose Beyond the traditional concerns of cost, time and quality, megaprojects often face criticism for failing to meet social responsibility expectations, which are essential for ensuring their long-term sustainability and legitimacy. Governance mechanisms, particularly contractual and relational mechanisms, offer potential pathways to improve megaproject social responsibility performance (MSRP). However, their effectiveness can vary depending on the host country's institutional environment, particularly in the context of international megaprojects. Therefore, this study examines the impact of governance mechanisms on MSRP and the role of the host country's institutional environment in moderating these effects with a specific focus on Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model comprising six hypotheses was developed. A questionnaire survey was designed, refined and distributed to the participants in the BRI megaprojects, yielding 145 valid responses. The resulting data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Findings The results indicate that both contractual governance and relational governance positively improve MSRP. While the host country's institutional environment does not directly impact MSRP, it plays a significant moderating role. Specifically, a weak institutional environment positively moderates the impact of contractual governance on MSRP, but it weakens the positive relationship between relational governance and MSRP. These results highlight the importance of adapting governance mechanisms based on the institutional context of the host country. Practical implications The findings suggest that policymakers and stakeholders should adopt context-specific governance frameworks that balance contractual and relational mechanisms while considering factors such as legal systems, political stability and economic development in the host country. Such tailored approaches enhance social responsibility performance in BRI megaprojects. Originality/value The study is one of the pioneering efforts to examine how different governance mechanisms enhance social responsibility performance in BRI megaprojects, with the host country's institutional environment playing a key role in shaping and determining the efficacy of these mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-04-2025-0143
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance mechanisms and social responsibility performance in international megaprojects: the contingent role of host country institutional environment

Mohammed Taha Alqershy, Diana R. Anbar, Qian Shi, Kawther Mousa
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Governance mechanisms and social responsibility performance in international megaprojects: the contingent role of host country institutional environment

Mohammed Taha Alqershy, Diana R. Anbar, Qian Shi, Kawther Mousa
article en

Abstract

Purpose Beyond the traditional concerns of cost, time and quality, megaprojects often face criticism for failing to meet social responsibility expectations, which are essential for ensuring their long-term sustainability and legitimacy. Governance mechanisms, particularly contractual and relational mechanisms, offer potential pathways to improve megaproject social responsibility performance (MSRP). However, their effectiveness can vary depending on the host country's institutional environment, particularly in the context of international megaprojects. Therefore, this study examines the impact of governance mechanisms on MSRP and the role of the host country's institutional environment in moderating these effects with a specific focus on Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual model comprising six hypotheses was developed. A questionnaire survey was designed, refined and distributed to the participants in the BRI megaprojects, yielding 145 valid responses. The resulting data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Findings The results indicate that both contractual governance and relational governance positively improve MSRP. While the host country's institutional environment does not directly impact MSRP, it plays a significant moderating role. Specifically, a weak institutional environment positively moderates the impact of contractual governance on MSRP, but it weakens the positive relationship between relational governance and MSRP. These results highlight the importance of adapting governance mechanisms based on the institutional context of the host country. Practical implications The findings suggest that policymakers and stakeholders should adopt context-specific governance frameworks that balance contractual and relational mechanisms while considering factors such as legal systems, political stability and economic development in the host country. Such tailored approaches enhance social responsibility performance in BRI megaprojects. Originality/value The study is one of the pioneering efforts to examine how different governance mechanisms enhance social responsibility performance in BRI megaprojects, with the host country's institutional environment playing a key role in shaping and determining the efficacy of these mechanisms.

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Tongji University (CN), Southeast University (BD), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.