Returning the Gift: The Emerging Politics of Toto, Blood and Plasma

This article investigates key ethical issues arising as part of the LiLACS NZ study, a study of Māori and non‐Māori living into advanced age. LiLACS NZ is the first longitudinal study of advanced ageing in the world that has an Indigenous cohort. In this article, we explore several key issues relating to the concepts of privacy and data access that have become salient in the years since the study data were collected, including (1) issues related to the age‐related diminished health and death of many of the participants in the study and of kaūmatua who were part of the study's cultural advisory group—the Rōpū Kaitiaki—who ensured appropriate tikanga was upheld during the study; (2) the question of who has responsibility for the study now that the Rōpū Kaitiaki no longer exists; and (3) how principles of Indigenous data sovereignty, including repatriation, might be applied to the study now, in its final phase. We propose that cultural understandings of hau (breath), whakapapa (genealogy) and toto (blood) must underpin key future decisions about the end of the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/kot2.70003
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Returning the Gift: The Emerging Politics of Toto, Blood and Plasma

Nicholas Jones, Marama Muru‐Lanning, Jade Farley
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Returning the Gift: The Emerging Politics of Toto, Blood and Plasma

Nicholas Jones, Marama Muru‐Lanning, Jade Farley
article en

Abstract

This article investigates key ethical issues arising as part of the LiLACS NZ study, a study of Māori and non‐Māori living into advanced age. LiLACS NZ is the first longitudinal study of advanced ageing in the world that has an Indigenous cohort. In this article, we explore several key issues relating to the concepts of privacy and data access that have become salient in the years since the study data were collected, including (1) issues related to the age‐related diminished health and death of many of the participants in the study and of kaūmatua who were part of the study's cultural advisory group—the Rōpū Kaitiaki—who ensured appropriate tikanga was upheld during the study; (2) the question of who has responsibility for the study now that the Rōpū Kaitiaki no longer exists; and (3) how principles of Indigenous data sovereignty, including repatriation, might be applied to the study now, in its final phase. We propose that cultural understandings of hau (breath), whakapapa (genealogy) and toto (blood) must underpin key future decisions about the end of the study.

Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences OnlineVol. 21(1)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.