A Path‐Specific Effect Approach to Mediation Analysis With Time‐Varying Mediators and Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Accounting for Competing Risks

Not accounting for competing events in survival analysis can lead to biased estimates, as individuals who die from other causes do not have the opportunity to develop the event of interest. Formal definitions and considerations for causal effects in the presence of competing risks have been published, but not for the mediation analysis setting when the exposure is not separable and both the outcome and the mediator are nonterminal events. We propose, for the first time, an approach based on the path-specific effects framework to account for competing risks in longitudinal mediation analysis with time-to-event outcomes. We do so by considering the pathway through the competing event as another mediator, which is nested within our longitudinal mediator of interest. We provide a theoretical formulation and related definitions of the effects of interest based on the mediational g-formula, as well as a detailed description of the algorithm. We also present a simulation study and an application of our algorithm to data from the Strong Heart Study, a prospective cohort of American Indian adults. In this application, we evaluated the mediating role of the blood pressure trajectory (measured in three visits) on the association of arsenic and cadmium with time to cardiovascular disease, accounting for competing risks by death. Identifying the effects through different paths enables us to evaluate the impact of metals on the outcome of interest, as well as through competing risks, more transparently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70425
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Path‐Specific Effect Approach to Mediation Analysis With Time‐Varying Mediators and Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Accounting for Competing Risks

B. A. Coull, Linda Valeri, Astrid M. Suchy‐Dicey, Yuchen Zhang et al.
Statistics in Medicine
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

A Path‐Specific Effect Approach to Mediation Analysis With Time‐Varying Mediators and Time‐to‐Event Outcomes Accounting for Competing Risks

B. A. Coull, Linda Valeri, Astrid M. Suchy‐Dicey, Yuchen Zhang, Ana Navas‐Acien, Kiros Berhane, Ziqing Wang, Arce Domingo‐Relloso, Joel Schwartz
article en

Abstract

Not accounting for competing events in survival analysis can lead to biased estimates, as individuals who die from other causes do not have the opportunity to develop the event of interest. Formal definitions and considerations for causal effects in the presence of competing risks have been published, but not for the mediation analysis setting when the exposure is not separable and both the outcome and the mediator are nonterminal events. We propose, for the first time, an approach based on the path-specific effects framework to account for competing risks in longitudinal mediation analysis with time-to-event outcomes. We do so by considering the pathway through the competing event as another mediator, which is nested within our longitudinal mediator of interest. We provide a theoretical formulation and related definitions of the effects of interest based on the mediational g-formula, as well as a detailed description of the algorithm. We also present a simulation study and an application of our algorithm to data from the Strong Heart Study, a prospective cohort of American Indian adults. In this application, we evaluated the mediating role of the blood pressure trajectory (measured in three visits) on the association of arsenic and cadmium with time to cardiovascular disease, accounting for competing risks by death. Identifying the effects through different paths enables us to evaluate the impact of metals on the outcome of interest, as well as through competing risks, more transparently.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 45(3-5)
Boston University (US), IE University (ES), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US), Harvard University (US), Neurosciences Institute (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.