Curriculum/program development in nursing education: a systematic review

The purpose of this study is to systematically examine program development studies in nursing education. This study is a systematic review. In this study, “Google Scholar”, “CINAHL Plus”, “Pubmed”, “Ulakbim-TR index” and “EBSCO host” databases were scanned. These scans; In English using the keywords “Program development”, “Curriculum development”, “Nursing program development”, “Program development in nursing”, “Curriculum development in nursing”, “Program development in nursing education” and “Curriculum development in nursing education” has been made. This systematic review utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) reporting checklist (Page et al. BMJ 372, 2021). The population of the study consisted of 3,823 articles. Articles published as research or systematic review between 2018 and 2023, whose publication language was English, whose keywords were included in the title of the publication, whose full text was accessible, and aimed at program development in nursing education were included in the study. A total of 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria constituted the sample. Data analysis was carried out in accordance with the data summary form prepared by the researchers. In this study, the findings related to the research questions are given under four headings. These titles are the research designs used in the studies, whether they were conducted in line with the stages of curriculum development, whether they were based on curriculum development models, and which fields and subjects they were conducted on. The majority of the studies conducted in the field of curriculum development are aimed at reviewing the literature and determining the current situation, which is the first step of curriculum development. In program development studies in nursing education; It has been determined that quantitative and qualitative research methods are used, the programs are developed within the scope of curriculum and educational program, and they focus on many different topics. It is recommended to increase the quality and quantity of program development studies in nursing education and parallel publications, and to design and improve qualified programs. No Patient or Public Contribution because this is a system-atic review of already existing literature. 524777 The study is not a clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04342-3
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curriculum/program development in nursing education: a systematic review

Hülya Kaya, Nil Küçük Yüceyurt
BMC Nursing
Nursing education and management
article

Curriculum/program development in nursing education: a systematic review

Hülya Kaya, Nil Küçük Yüceyurt
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to systematically examine program development studies in nursing education. This study is a systematic review. In this study, “Google Scholar”, “CINAHL Plus”, “Pubmed”, “Ulakbim-TR index” and “EBSCO host” databases were scanned. These scans; In English using the keywords “Program development”, “Curriculum development”, “Nursing program development”, “Program development in nursing”, “Curriculum development in nursing”, “Program development in nursing education” and “Curriculum development in nursing education” has been made. This systematic review utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) reporting checklist (Page et al. BMJ 372, 2021). The population of the study consisted of 3,823 articles. Articles published as research or systematic review between 2018 and 2023, whose publication language was English, whose keywords were included in the title of the publication, whose full text was accessible, and aimed at program development in nursing education were included in the study. A total of 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria constituted the sample. Data analysis was carried out in accordance with the data summary form prepared by the researchers. In this study, the findings related to the research questions are given under four headings. These titles are the research designs used in the studies, whether they were conducted in line with the stages of curriculum development, whether they were based on curriculum development models, and which fields and subjects they were conducted on. The majority of the studies conducted in the field of curriculum development are aimed at reviewing the literature and determining the current situation, which is the first step of curriculum development. In program development studies in nursing education; It has been determined that quantitative and qualitative research methods are used, the programs are developed within the scope of curriculum and educational program, and they focus on many different topics. It is recommended to increase the quality and quantity of program development studies in nursing education and parallel publications, and to design and improve qualified programs. No Patient or Public Contribution because this is a system-atic review of already existing literature. 524777 The study is not a clinical trial.

BMC NursingVol. 25(1)
Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.