A Comprehensive Analysis of Influencing Factors in Highway Route Selection and Application of an Integrated Optimization Model

To address the complex influencing factors, divergent stakeholder demands, and the challenge of quantitative comparison in alignment selection for highway expansion and reconstruction, we systematically reviewed the relevant factors. These factors were classified into four categories—economy, technology, safety, and environment—and comprise 16 subfactors in total. The symmetry of the route selection process is disrupted by the varying priorities of different stakeholders, leading to asymmetric evaluations of the alternatives. Using the G30 Lianhuo Expressway Jingqing section expansion and reconstruction project as a case study, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined with expert judgment to derive weights for each factor. The results indicate that environmental factors carry substantial weight, reflecting increased awareness of environmental protection in contemporary projects. We then developed a comparative model based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Applying this model to alignment alternatives between the Jingjiadian and Huachacun sections indicates that Option 4 is the preferred alignment. Overall, the AHP–TOPSIS composite evaluation framework effectively integrates expert knowledge with objective quantitative analysis. It enables the scientific ranking of alternatives and provides decision support for alignment selection in mountainous highways and other linear engineering projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18020296
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Analysis of Influencing Factors in Highway Route Selection and Application of an Integrated Optimization Model

Sende Wang, Zhigang Zeng, Jian Zhang, Haikuo Liu
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Comprehensive Analysis of Influencing Factors in Highway Route Selection and Application of an Integrated Optimization Model

Sende Wang, Zhigang Zeng, Jian Zhang, Haikuo Liu
article en

Abstract

To address the complex influencing factors, divergent stakeholder demands, and the challenge of quantitative comparison in alignment selection for highway expansion and reconstruction, we systematically reviewed the relevant factors. These factors were classified into four categories—economy, technology, safety, and environment—and comprise 16 subfactors in total. The symmetry of the route selection process is disrupted by the varying priorities of different stakeholders, leading to asymmetric evaluations of the alternatives. Using the G30 Lianhuo Expressway Jingqing section expansion and reconstruction project as a case study, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined with expert judgment to derive weights for each factor. The results indicate that environmental factors carry substantial weight, reflecting increased awareness of environmental protection in contemporary projects. We then developed a comparative model based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Applying this model to alignment alternatives between the Jingjiadian and Huachacun sections indicates that Option 4 is the preferred alignment. Overall, the AHP–TOPSIS composite evaluation framework effectively integrates expert knowledge with objective quantitative analysis. It enables the scientific ranking of alternatives and provides decision support for alignment selection in mountainous highways and other linear engineering projects.

SymmetryVol. 18(2)
Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN), Guzhou Transportation Planning Survey & Design Academe (China) (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.