Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Metric-Based Approach

This paper addresses the growing need for reliable methods to evaluate the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) systems as they become widely used in both critical domains and everyday applications. The study aims to develop a metric-based approach to assessing AI system quality by harmonising product quality and quality in use models in line with updated international standards. To achieve this, the authors analyse existing ISO/IEC 25000 series standards, identifying inconsistencies between older and newer versions, and propose an updated quality model that incorporates both perspectives. Building on guidance documents, international standards, and contemporary research, the study introduces a set of metrics designed to measure new subcharacteristics of AI system quality, particularly where standardised metrics have not yet been developed. The proposed approach bridges the gap between established quality models (ISO/IEC 25010:2023, ISO/IEC 25019:2023, ISO/IEC 25059:2023) and standardised measurement practices (ISO/IEC 25023:2016, ISO/IEC 25022:2016), enabling more consistent and practical evaluation of AI systems. These metrics can be applied by researchers and practitioners to improve the quality of AI systems, enhance their reliability, and reduce risks associated with insufficient quality. Future work will focus on empirical validation of the proposed approach to confirm its applicability and usefulness across diverse AI applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15030691
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Metric-Based Approach

Anatoliy Gorbenko, Austen Rainer, Olga Tarasyuk, Daria Gordieieva et al.
Electronics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Quality Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Metric-Based Approach

Anatoliy Gorbenko, Austen Rainer, Olga Tarasyuk, Daria Gordieieva, Oleksandr Gordieiev
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses the growing need for reliable methods to evaluate the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) systems as they become widely used in both critical domains and everyday applications. The study aims to develop a metric-based approach to assessing AI system quality by harmonising product quality and quality in use models in line with updated international standards. To achieve this, the authors analyse existing ISO/IEC 25000 series standards, identifying inconsistencies between older and newer versions, and propose an updated quality model that incorporates both perspectives. Building on guidance documents, international standards, and contemporary research, the study introduces a set of metrics designed to measure new subcharacteristics of AI system quality, particularly where standardised metrics have not yet been developed. The proposed approach bridges the gap between established quality models (ISO/IEC 25010:2023, ISO/IEC 25019:2023, ISO/IEC 25059:2023) and standardised measurement practices (ISO/IEC 25023:2016, ISO/IEC 25022:2016), enabling more consistent and practical evaluation of AI systems. These metrics can be applied by researchers and practitioners to improve the quality of AI systems, enhance their reliability, and reduce risks associated with insufficient quality. Future work will focus on empirical validation of the proposed approach to confirm its applicability and usefulness across diverse AI applications.

ElectronicsVol. 15(3)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.