Clinically relevant factors impacting the efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback in stroke and spinal cord injury rehabilitation

Rehabilitation professionals address upper extremity rehabilitation following a stroke or spinal cord injury by promoting motor recovery and compensatory strategy training. Electromyography biofeedback (EMG BF) interventions have been used to address these goals, though the evidence to support their efficacy is mixed. This review categorizes the literature according to the motor learning principles underlying each intervention. Articles that described EMG BF interventions to address upper extremity deficits in individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury were included in the review. Articles were assessed based on experimental design, type of intervention provided, and results obtained. Twelve studies were identified and reviewed. Synthesis of the literature suggests that EMG BF interventions that provide knowledge of results show different patterns of effectiveness compared to those that provide knowledge of performance. This method of categorizing interventions is not commonly used in the literature and is recommended for rehabilitation professionals to aid in clinical decision-making for upper extremity neurorehabilitation. Implications for rehabilitation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-025-00226-5
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinically relevant factors impacting the efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback in stroke and spinal cord injury rehabilitation

Edelle C. Field‐Fote, Marissa R. Mirecki
Discover Neuroscience
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Clinically relevant factors impacting the efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback in stroke and spinal cord injury rehabilitation

Edelle C. Field‐Fote, Marissa R. Mirecki
article en

Abstract

Rehabilitation professionals address upper extremity rehabilitation following a stroke or spinal cord injury by promoting motor recovery and compensatory strategy training. Electromyography biofeedback (EMG BF) interventions have been used to address these goals, though the evidence to support their efficacy is mixed. This review categorizes the literature according to the motor learning principles underlying each intervention. Articles that described EMG BF interventions to address upper extremity deficits in individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury were included in the review. Articles were assessed based on experimental design, type of intervention provided, and results obtained. Twelve studies were identified and reviewed. Synthesis of the literature suggests that EMG BF interventions that provide knowledge of results show different patterns of effectiveness compared to those that provide knowledge of performance. This method of categorizing interventions is not commonly used in the literature and is recommended for rehabilitation professionals to aid in clinical decision-making for upper extremity neurorehabilitation. Implications for rehabilitation

Discover NeuroscienceVol. 21(1)
Emory Healthcare (US), Emory University (US), Emory University Hospital (US), Shepherd Center (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.