Experimental determination of Johnson–Cook strength and failure model constants for AA1100H14 aluminum alloy and validation through ballistic impact testing

This study presents the experimental determination of Johnson–Cook (JC) strength and failure model constants for AA1100H14 aluminum alloy and their validation through ballistic impact testing. A series of mechanical testing has been performed using an INSTRON UTM for low and a SHPB under high strain-rate conditions, covering a range of strain rates (10 −4 to 190 s −1 ) and temperatures (25°C to 300°C). The derived JC parameters, capturing alloy's strain hardening, strain-rate sensitivity, and thermal softening behavior, are incorporated in ANSYS/AUTODYN software for simulations. Simulations modeled ballistic impact scenarios with three different nose shapes of projectiles: blunt, conical and ogive, made of 4340 steel impacting AA1100H14 targets under conditions matching experimental testing. The predicted residual velocities and damage mode, such as shear plugging for blunt projectiles and petalling for conical and ogive projectiles, are compared with the outcomes of ballistic tests. The close agreement between simulated and experimental results confirms the accuracy of the experimentally determined JC model parameters, exhibiting their relevance in forecasting the dynamic behavior of AA1100H14 under ballistic impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207261417664
Primary Topic
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental determination of Johnson–Cook strength and failure model constants for AA1100H14 aluminum alloy and validation through ballistic impact testing

Deepak Kumar Singh, Debasis Datta, Arkadeb Banerjee
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
article

Experimental determination of Johnson–Cook strength and failure model constants for AA1100H14 aluminum alloy and validation through ballistic impact testing

Deepak Kumar Singh, Debasis Datta, Arkadeb Banerjee
article en

Abstract

This study presents the experimental determination of Johnson–Cook (JC) strength and failure model constants for AA1100H14 aluminum alloy and their validation through ballistic impact testing. A series of mechanical testing has been performed using an INSTRON UTM for low and a SHPB under high strain-rate conditions, covering a range of strain rates (10 −4 to 190 s −1 ) and temperatures (25°C to 300°C). The derived JC parameters, capturing alloy's strain hardening, strain-rate sensitivity, and thermal softening behavior, are incorporated in ANSYS/AUTODYN software for simulations. Simulations modeled ballistic impact scenarios with three different nose shapes of projectiles: blunt, conical and ogive, made of 4340 steel impacting AA1100H14 targets under conditions matching experimental testing. The predicted residual velocities and damage mode, such as shear plugging for blunt projectiles and petalling for conical and ogive projectiles, are compared with the outcomes of ballistic tests. The close agreement between simulated and experimental results confirms the accuracy of the experimentally determined JC model parameters, exhibiting their relevance in forecasting the dynamic behavior of AA1100H14 under ballistic impact.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications
Institute of Engineering Science (RU), Proof & Experimental Establishment (IN), Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.