3771 Improving clinical frailty score documentation in oncology wards

Abstract Introduction The Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) allows appropriate frailty assessment to guide management plans for oncology patients. CFS documentation is not standard at our trust. We aimed to introduce CFS documentation in the Acute Oncology Service (AOS) clerking proforma and evaluate its use in patients aged >65 to help guide management. Methods Data was obtained from inpatients on the oncology wards via NerveCentre. Three PDSA cycles were completed: Cycle 1: An evaluation to identify how many patients had a documented CFS. Based on this, a poster was created, emailed to oncology staff, and displayed around the ward. Cycle 2: A teaching presentation was delivered to junior doctors on the oncology ward. Cycle 3: Nursing staff were informed and encouraged to discuss CFS during morning board rounds. Data was collected after each cycle. Results There was a total increase of 20% in documentation after all three interventions. The initial documentation rate was 4.4%. This rose to 6.6% after posters were introduced, increased to 15.5% following junior doctor teaching, and reached 24.4% after involving nursing staff in PDSA Cycle 3. Conclusion Educating junior doctors and involving nurses in discussions around CFS helped improve documentation. It has been noted that identifying the CFS on admission increases the likelihood of it being recorded. Since the improvement is still modest, we now plan to incorporate the CFS into the AOS clerking proforma to increase compliance and make documentation part of routine practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.029
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3771 Improving clinical frailty score documentation in oncology wards

L Manokaran, P Biju
Age and Ageing
Frailty in Older Adults
article

3771 Improving clinical frailty score documentation in oncology wards

L Manokaran, P Biju
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) allows appropriate frailty assessment to guide management plans for oncology patients. CFS documentation is not standard at our trust. We aimed to introduce CFS documentation in the Acute Oncology Service (AOS) clerking proforma and evaluate its use in patients aged >65 to help guide management. Methods Data was obtained from inpatients on the oncology wards via NerveCentre. Three PDSA cycles were completed: Cycle 1: An evaluation to identify how many patients had a documented CFS. Based on this, a poster was created, emailed to oncology staff, and displayed around the ward. Cycle 2: A teaching presentation was delivered to junior doctors on the oncology ward. Cycle 3: Nursing staff were informed and encouraged to discuss CFS during morning board rounds. Data was collected after each cycle. Results There was a total increase of 20% in documentation after all three interventions. The initial documentation rate was 4.4%. This rose to 6.6% after posters were introduced, increased to 15.5% following junior doctor teaching, and reached 24.4% after involving nursing staff in PDSA Cycle 3. Conclusion Educating junior doctors and involving nurses in discussions around CFS helped improve documentation. It has been noted that identifying the CFS on admission increases the likelihood of it being recorded. Since the improvement is still modest, we now plan to incorporate the CFS into the AOS clerking proforma to increase compliance and make documentation part of routine practice.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
Southend Hospital (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.