Prism effects on total station measurements: steps towards computational correction

Systematic effects on total station measurements arising from solid glass corner cube prisms can lead to deviations at the mm-level. We show that these deviations can be mitigated by forward modeling based on geometrical optics and assumed properties of the reflectors, or by empirical modeling based on calibration measurements with a variety of reflector poses. Establishing the forward model is less costly, but some empirical modeling is required to derive necessary pa-rameters which are not disclosed by the manufacturers. Empirical modeling can better account for specific deviations of individual prisms and for deviations related to the particular data pro-cessing within a total station. Corrections obtained by modeling are applicable to measurements of moving prisms, e.g., for tracking drones or construction machines, and to geodetic network measurements where differences exceeding 5 mm could result from uncorrected prism effects even when using high-precision single prisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3217/978-3-99161-070-0-019
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prism effects on total station measurements: steps towards computational correction

Robert Presl, Andreas Wieser, Tomas Thalmann, Lucas Dammert et al.
Open MIND
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Prism effects on total station measurements: steps towards computational correction

Robert Presl, Andreas Wieser, Tomas Thalmann, Lucas Dammert, Hans Neuner
article en

Abstract

Systematic effects on total station measurements arising from solid glass corner cube prisms can lead to deviations at the mm-level. We show that these deviations can be mitigated by forward modeling based on geometrical optics and assumed properties of the reflectors, or by empirical modeling based on calibration measurements with a variety of reflector poses. Establishing the forward model is less costly, but some empirical modeling is required to derive necessary pa-rameters which are not disclosed by the manufacturers. Empirical modeling can better account for specific deviations of individual prisms and for deviations related to the particular data pro-cessing within a total station. Corrections obtained by modeling are applicable to measurements of moving prisms, e.g., for tracking drones or construction machines, and to geodetic network measurements where differences exceeding 5 mm could result from uncorrected prism effects even when using high-precision single prisms.

Open MIND
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prism effects on total station measurements: steps towards computational correction — Robert Presl, Andreas Wieser, et al. · Open MIND (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS