Raging With Science? Fathers’ Rights Advocacy and the State-Feminist Knowledge Regime in Norway (1985–1997)

Long dismissed as enfants terribles of family policy debates, fathers’ rights activists have often been portrayed as emotional, antifeminist and epistemically reckless. This article examines how the Norwegian Joint Custody Association, Foreningen 2 Foreldre (F2F), developed and circulated knowledge in the period 1985–1997. The article analyses how the leaders of F2F positioned themselves as counter-experts in relation to what I conceptualize as a state-feminist knowledge regime . Drawing on oral history interviews with former activists and archival material, it shows how their engagement with knowledge developed into a sustained critique of local expert authority. Rather than relying on reductive portrayals of fathers’ rights advocates, the article situates F2F within a contested policy terrain. In doing so, it explores what their story can teach us about the shifting boundaries of expertise and gender politics in the Nordic welfare state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Men s Studies
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265261418604
Primary Topic
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raging With Science? Fathers’ Rights Advocacy and the State-Feminist Knowledge Regime in Norway (1985–1997)

Simon Gramvik
The Journal of Men s Studies
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
article

Raging With Science? Fathers’ Rights Advocacy and the State-Feminist Knowledge Regime in Norway (1985–1997)

Simon Gramvik
article en

Abstract

Long dismissed as enfants terribles of family policy debates, fathers’ rights activists have often been portrayed as emotional, antifeminist and epistemically reckless. This article examines how the Norwegian Joint Custody Association, Foreningen 2 Foreldre (F2F), developed and circulated knowledge in the period 1985–1997. The article analyses how the leaders of F2F positioned themselves as counter-experts in relation to what I conceptualize as a state-feminist knowledge regime . Drawing on oral history interviews with former activists and archival material, it shows how their engagement with knowledge developed into a sustained critique of local expert authority. Rather than relying on reductive portrayals of fathers’ rights advocates, the article situates F2F within a contested policy terrain. In doing so, it explores what their story can teach us about the shifting boundaries of expertise and gender politics in the Nordic welfare state.

The Journal of Men s Studies
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.