3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review

Abstract Background Use of anticholinergic medication is increasing, especially among the older population due to polypharmacy and co-morbidities. High anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse effects such as reduced mobility and future dementia risk. Acute hospital stay may be an appropriate time to target this commonly overlooked problem. Aims To explore the effects of deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden on health outcomes of hospitalised older people. Method Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for relevant papers from database inception to September 2024. Studies that involved a deprescribing or medication review intervention to reduce anticholinergic burden within a hospital setting in older people (≥65 years old) were included. Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines were used for narrative synthesis and Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists were used for quality assessment. Results 2042 papers were identified, and eight papers were included in this review. There was heterogeneity of design and outcomes across the studies with generally short follow-up. Study designs included: cohort (n = 4), pre-post quasi-experimental (n = 3) and audit (n = 1). Outcomes reported included: medication-related outcomes (n = 8), acceptability (n = 4) and clinical outcomes (n = 1). No studies reported on safety or costs. Six studies reported a reduction in anticholinergic burden score following the intervention, two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients taking anticholinergic medication following intervention. The quality of the studies varied and ranged from poor to moderate. Conclusion This review found that deprescribing interventions within a hospital setting may be acceptable and successful in reducing anticholinergic burden in older adults. However, effectiveness of intervention on important clinical outcomes could not be determined due to short follow-ups and limited data on clinical outcomes, costs, and safety. In future, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to focus on clinical outcomes and involve longer durations of follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf368.134
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review

Sean H. Lim, Richard W. Griffiths, Liam Jones, K Ibrahim et al.
Age and Ageing
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

3695 Deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden in older hospitalised adults: a systematic review

Sean H. Lim, Richard W. Griffiths, Liam Jones, K Ibrahim, A Bates
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Use of anticholinergic medication is increasing, especially among the older population due to polypharmacy and co-morbidities. High anticholinergic burden is associated with adverse effects such as reduced mobility and future dementia risk. Acute hospital stay may be an appropriate time to target this commonly overlooked problem. Aims To explore the effects of deprescribing medications with anticholinergic burden on health outcomes of hospitalised older people. Method Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for relevant papers from database inception to September 2024. Studies that involved a deprescribing or medication review intervention to reduce anticholinergic burden within a hospital setting in older people (≥65 years old) were included. Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines were used for narrative synthesis and Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists were used for quality assessment. Results 2042 papers were identified, and eight papers were included in this review. There was heterogeneity of design and outcomes across the studies with generally short follow-up. Study designs included: cohort (n = 4), pre-post quasi-experimental (n = 3) and audit (n = 1). Outcomes reported included: medication-related outcomes (n = 8), acceptability (n = 4) and clinical outcomes (n = 1). No studies reported on safety or costs. Six studies reported a reduction in anticholinergic burden score following the intervention, two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in the proportion of patients taking anticholinergic medication following intervention. The quality of the studies varied and ranged from poor to moderate. Conclusion This review found that deprescribing interventions within a hospital setting may be acceptable and successful in reducing anticholinergic burden in older adults. However, effectiveness of intervention on important clinical outcomes could not be determined due to short follow-ups and limited data on clinical outcomes, costs, and safety. In future, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to focus on clinical outcomes and involve longer durations of follow-up.

Age and AgeingVol. 55(Supplement_1)
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Southampton (GB), Wessex Institute of Technology (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.