Race and robots: a critical discussion on discrimination and inclusion in robotics

Abstract This paper tackles the complex issue of "race" and "diversity" in contemporary robotics. Studies conducted by Sparrow (Sci Technol Hum Values 45 3 538 560) and Bartneck et al. (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Chicago, 2018) concluded that the (mediated) image and (material) shape of robots reveal discrimination and segregation processes similar to those experienced by ethnic minorities in contemporary societies—and they are as such, machine embodiments of human racism. It is true that there seems to exist a formal standardisation of robots' appearance, often inspired by Western cultural models. But in the global and rapid developments of robotics, robots are also increasingly dyed with the colours of ethnic diversity—they are "racialised" to better fit alternative models (ethnic black robots, Asian-styled humanoids, and so on). Yet, most anthropomorphic robots are race-free. Beyond the burning issue of apparent/alleged "racism" in robot design and, by extension, the existence of the WEIRD ( Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic) complex in contemporary robotics and technologies, this paper examines different models of robots designed in countries from the Global South (Africa, Asia) and raises the fundamental ambivalence of robots that are both subjected to racism (as almost human) and racialised (coloured) / used as weapons of resistance against racial discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-026-00475-6
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Race and robots: a critical discussion on discrimination and inclusion in robotics

Lionel Obadia
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Race and robots: a critical discussion on discrimination and inclusion in robotics

Lionel Obadia
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper tackles the complex issue of "race" and "diversity" in contemporary robotics. Studies conducted by Sparrow (Sci Technol Hum Values 45 3 538 560) and Bartneck et al. (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Chicago, 2018) concluded that the (mediated) image and (material) shape of robots reveal discrimination and segregation processes similar to those experienced by ethnic minorities in contemporary societies—and they are as such, machine embodiments of human racism. It is true that there seems to exist a formal standardisation of robots' appearance, often inspired by Western cultural models. But in the global and rapid developments of robotics, robots are also increasingly dyed with the colours of ethnic diversity—they are "racialised" to better fit alternative models (ethnic black robots, Asian-styled humanoids, and so on). Yet, most anthropomorphic robots are race-free. Beyond the burning issue of apparent/alleged "racism" in robot design and, by extension, the existence of the WEIRD ( Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic) complex in contemporary robotics and technologies, this paper examines different models of robots designed in countries from the Global South (Africa, Asia) and raises the fundamental ambivalence of robots that are both subjected to racism (as almost human) and racialised (coloured) / used as weapons of resistance against racial discrimination.

Journal on Multimodal User InterfacesVol. 20(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire de Recherche Historique Rhône-Alpes (FR)
Université Lumière Lyon 2
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.