A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Method Considering Personalized Individual Semantics in a Probabilistic Linguistic Environment

Abstract Individual cognitive differences may cause decision makers to interpret the same linguistic terms differently. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel consensus model for large-scale group decision-making by incorporating personalized individual semantics into a probabilistic linguistic preference framework. A normalization method integrating emotional tone is introduced to refine probabilistic linguistic preference relations, and an additive consistency-based semantic optimization model is developed to assign appropriate linguistic terms to decision makers. To promote interaction among those with similar interests, a weighting method based on semantic similarity and a fuzzy clustering algorithm using personalized individual semantics are employed to form subgroups with similar semantics. A consensus-reaching process, including assessment and feedback stages, is then applied to guide decision makers toward agreement. A case study on environmental project selection verifies the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09963-2
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Method Considering Personalized Individual Semantics in a Probabilistic Linguistic Environment

Mingrui Fan, Xiao Liang, Xiaoxia Xu, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
Group Decision and Negotiation
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Method Considering Personalized Individual Semantics in a Probabilistic Linguistic Environment

Mingrui Fan, Xiao Liang, Xiaoxia Xu, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Individual cognitive differences may cause decision makers to interpret the same linguistic terms differently. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel consensus model for large-scale group decision-making by incorporating personalized individual semantics into a probabilistic linguistic preference framework. A normalization method integrating emotional tone is introduced to refine probabilistic linguistic preference relations, and an additive consistency-based semantic optimization model is developed to assign appropriate linguistic terms to decision makers. To promote interaction among those with similar interests, a weighting method based on semantic similarity and a fuzzy clustering algorithm using personalized individual semantics are employed to form subgroups with similar semantics. A consensus-reaching process, including assessment and feedback stages, is then applied to guide decision makers toward agreement. A case study on environmental project selection verifies the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach.

Group Decision and NegotiationVol. 35(1)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (ES), University of Reading (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.