Toward a Consensus Characterization Protocol for Organic Thermoelectrics

As the field of organic thermoelectrics advances toward maturity, an accurate and standardized reporting of performance metrics becomes essential to drive further progress and assess real-world viability. The common geometric form factors and material properties (conductivity, anisotropy, stability, etc.) differ from those of conventional bulk inorganic systems, and thus specific recommendations may apply. Herein, we compile prevalent points of concern in the reporting of thermoelectric performance for organic materials and devices. Moreover, we propose a list of critical factors and metrics that should be explicitly documented when reporting the performance of novel organic thermoelectric materials or devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202520430
Primary Topic
Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Consensus Characterization Protocol for Organic Thermoelectrics

Guangzheng Zuo, Dorothea Scheunemann, Michael L. Chabinyc, Shannon K. Yee et al.
Advanced Materials
Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
article

Toward a Consensus Characterization Protocol for Organic Thermoelectrics

Guangzheng Zuo, Dorothea Scheunemann, Michael L. Chabinyc, Shannon K. Yee, Irene Brunetti, J. S. Reparaz, Ian E. Jacobs, Toshiki Mori, Nathan James Pataki, Mariano Campoy‐Quiles, Mario Caironi, Martijn Kemerink, Bernhard Dörling
article en

Abstract

As the field of organic thermoelectrics advances toward maturity, an accurate and standardized reporting of performance metrics becomes essential to drive further progress and assess real-world viability. The common geometric form factors and material properties (conductivity, anisotropy, stability, etc.) differ from those of conventional bulk inorganic systems, and thus specific recommendations may apply. Herein, we compile prevalent points of concern in the reporting of thermoelectric performance for organic materials and devices. Moreover, we propose a list of critical factors and metrics that should be explicitly documented when reporting the performance of novel organic thermoelectric materials or devices.

Advanced MaterialsVol. 38(14)
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), XLAB (Slovenia) (SI), Seoul National University (KR), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), National Institute for Materials Science (JP), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), New Generation University College (ET), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), Bridge University (SS), Robotics Research (United States) (US), Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ES), Center for Nano Science and Technology (IT), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
National Science Foundation, European Commission, National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Division of Materials Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.