Effects of Different Corn Processing Methods and Urea Sources on Ruminal Digestion and In Vitro Degradation

This study aimed to assess the impact of different corn processing methods and urea sources on ruminal digestion. Four diets were compared: T1—ground corn with conventional urea; T2—ground corn with slow‐release urea; T3—rehydrated corn with conventional urea; and T4—rehydrated corn with slow‐release urea. Ruminal parameters, including pH, volatile fatty acid production, and ammonia nitrogen concentration, as well as cumulative gas production, ruminal fermentation kinetics, and dry matter degradability up to 96 h post‐incubation, were evaluated. Alatin square design with four treatments, four experimental periods, and two replicates (eight animals), resulting in two simultaneous Latin squares, was used for ruminal parameter assessment. Gas production and dry matter degradation were analyzed using a completely randomized design with four treatments and four replications using in vitro incubations. Diets with rehydrated corn showed higher propionate proportions compared to ground corn diets. Cumulative gas production did not differ significantly among treatments ( p < 0.05). Rehydrated corn diets (T3 and T4) showed greater dry matter degradability ( p < 0.05) in the first 24 h. A strong correlation between gas production and dry matter degradation was observed across all diets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jag2.70006
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Different Corn Processing Methods and Urea Sources on Ruminal Digestion and In Vitro Degradation

Bruno Borges Deminicis, Angelo Herbet Moreira Arcanjo, Fernanda de Kássia Gomes, Rocha Norberto Silva et al.
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Effects of Different Corn Processing Methods and Urea Sources on Ruminal Digestion and In Vitro Degradation

Bruno Borges Deminicis, Angelo Herbet Moreira Arcanjo, Fernanda de Kássia Gomes, Rocha Norberto Silva, Saulo Alberto do Carmo Araújo, Marcos Augusto dos Reis Nogueira
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the impact of different corn processing methods and urea sources on ruminal digestion. Four diets were compared: T1—ground corn with conventional urea; T2—ground corn with slow‐release urea; T3—rehydrated corn with conventional urea; and T4—rehydrated corn with slow‐release urea. Ruminal parameters, including pH, volatile fatty acid production, and ammonia nitrogen concentration, as well as cumulative gas production, ruminal fermentation kinetics, and dry matter degradability up to 96 h post‐incubation, were evaluated. Alatin square design with four treatments, four experimental periods, and two replicates (eight animals), resulting in two simultaneous Latin squares, was used for ruminal parameter assessment. Gas production and dry matter degradation were analyzed using a completely randomized design with four treatments and four replications using in vitro incubations. Diets with rehydrated corn showed higher propionate proportions compared to ground corn diets. Cumulative gas production did not differ significantly among treatments ( p < 0.05). Rehydrated corn diets (T3 and T4) showed greater dry matter degradability ( p < 0.05) in the first 24 h. A strong correlation between gas production and dry matter degradation was observed across all diets.

New Zealand Journal of Agricultural ResearchVol. 69(1)
State University of Norte Fluminense (BR), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR), Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (BR), Faculdade Única (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.