Transnational Competition Law Rules: A Political Economy Perspective

This contribution critically examines the absence of a comprehensive transnational competition law regime and explores the role of competition authority cooperation as an alternative form of governance. It examines the political economy of past harmonisation efforts, current transnational approaches, and the viability of a global competition law framework. Grounded in the public autonomy–private rights paradigm, the authors assess the tensions between technocratic governance and democratic legitimacy, which extend from domestic competition policies to international cooperation mechanisms such as the International Competition Network. The authors explore the potential of a Plurilateral Agreement on Competition to mitigate cross-border externalities and enhance global welfare and critically evaluate whether the efficiency gains such an agreement might yield justify the erosion of public autonomy inherent in technocratic structures. Highlighting the importance of regional diversity in competition law frameworks, the authors contend that context-sensitive, institutionally pluralistic approaches provide a more effective means of balancing public autonomy with the protection of private rights while adapting to individual jurisdictions’ unique economic and political contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transnational Competition Law Rules: A Political Economy Perspective

F. Beneke Ávila, S. Rohr
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
World Trade Organization Law
article

Transnational Competition Law Rules: A Political Economy Perspective

F. Beneke Ávila, S. Rohr
article en

Abstract

This contribution critically examines the absence of a comprehensive transnational competition law regime and explores the role of competition authority cooperation as an alternative form of governance. It examines the political economy of past harmonisation efforts, current transnational approaches, and the viability of a global competition law framework. Grounded in the public autonomy–private rights paradigm, the authors assess the tensions between technocratic governance and democratic legitimacy, which extend from domestic competition policies to international cooperation mechanisms such as the International Competition Network. The authors explore the potential of a Plurilateral Agreement on Competition to mitigate cross-border externalities and enhance global welfare and critically evaluate whether the efficiency gains such an agreement might yield justify the erosion of public autonomy inherent in technocratic structures. Highlighting the importance of regional diversity in competition law frameworks, the authors contend that context-sensitive, institutionally pluralistic approaches provide a more effective means of balancing public autonomy with the protection of private rights while adapting to individual jurisdictions’ unique economic and political contexts.

MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transnational Competition Law Rules: A Political Economy Perspective — F. Beneke Ávila, S. Rohr · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS