Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff:a systematic review and meta-synthesis

<b>Objective: </b>Workplace disclosure of LGBTQ+ identity by healthcare employees is an understudied area and existing reviews of LGBTQ+ disclosure in the healthcare sector focus on patient perspectives, overlooking the unique challenges that healthcare professionals encounter. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare employees.<br/><br/><b>Method: </b>The literature search integrated current research from 2011 to March 2023 and focused on qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare professionals. Ovid served as the primary platform for literature searches, supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking and additional searches in academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus. The studies underwent quality evaluation using the CASP 2022 checklist and were synthesised using thematic analysis.<br/><br/><b>Results: </b>The findings revealed seven studies with five prominent themes: (1) risk associated with disclosure, (2) making the decision to disclose, (3) cost of non-disclosure, (4) cost of disclosure, and (5) benefit of disclosure. Additionally, five critical factors of disclosure were identified: level, scope, time, elements, and method. Finally, the risk-benefit analysis underscored the dilemma and balance between authenticity and conformity, largely influenced by pervasive heteronormativity, resulting in a significant mental toll. <br/><br/><b>Conclusion:</b> The findings must be interpreted considering certain limitations, such as the lack of generalisability of studies. However, the findings emphasise the critical need for cultivating trusting and accepting healthcare work environments for LGBTQ+ staff.<br/><br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-01-22
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff:a systematic review and meta-synthesis

Sarah Dorrington, Stephani; id_orcid 0000-0001-9103-2427 Hatch, Isaac O. Akande, Lucy Manning et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff:a systematic review and meta-synthesis

Sarah Dorrington, Stephani; id_orcid 0000-0001-9103-2427 Hatch, Isaac O. Akande, Lucy Manning, Reem; id_orcid 0009-0009-8037-4080 Prakkash, Laia; id_orcid 0000-0002-4207-074X Becares
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective: </b>Workplace disclosure of LGBTQ+ identity by healthcare employees is an understudied area and existing reviews of LGBTQ+ disclosure in the healthcare sector focus on patient perspectives, overlooking the unique challenges that healthcare professionals encounter. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare employees.<br/><br/><b>Method: </b>The literature search integrated current research from 2011 to March 2023 and focused on qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare professionals. Ovid served as the primary platform for literature searches, supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking and additional searches in academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus. The studies underwent quality evaluation using the CASP 2022 checklist and were synthesised using thematic analysis.<br/><br/><b>Results: </b>The findings revealed seven studies with five prominent themes: (1) risk associated with disclosure, (2) making the decision to disclose, (3) cost of non-disclosure, (4) cost of disclosure, and (5) benefit of disclosure. Additionally, five critical factors of disclosure were identified: level, scope, time, elements, and method. Finally, the risk-benefit analysis underscored the dilemma and balance between authenticity and conformity, largely influenced by pervasive heteronormativity, resulting in a significant mental toll. <br/><br/><b>Conclusion:</b> The findings must be interpreted considering certain limitations, such as the lack of generalisability of studies. However, the findings emphasise the critical need for cultivating trusting and accepting healthcare work environments for LGBTQ+ staff.<br/><br/>

Research Portal (King's College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disclosure experiences in LGBTQ+ healthcare staff:a systematic review and meta-synthesis — Sarah Dorrington, Stephani; id_orcid 0000-0001-9103-2427 Hatch, et al. · Research Portal (King's College London) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS