Who Checks the Fact-Checkers? AI, Misinformation, and Knowledge Intermediaries

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to transmit information in democratic societies presents a new problem for scientific objectivity. This paper extends objectivity from knowledge production to knowledge transmission. It analyses how an overlooked type of agent—knowledge intermediaries—produces an overlooked type of trust—external trust. In practice, citizens rely on intermediaries to transmit trustworthy information. This paper argues that centralised techno-legal approaches, privileging AIs as epistemically superior intermediaries, risk epistemic harm to human intermediaries. In contrast, a decentralised intermediaries approach that values contestation among human intermediaries is a better way to transmit trustworthy information and resist misinformation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Published
2026-02-02
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Checks the Fact-Checkers? AI, Misinformation, and Knowledge Intermediaries

Richard Williams
PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Who Checks the Fact-Checkers? AI, Misinformation, and Knowledge Intermediaries

Richard Williams
article en

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) to transmit information in democratic societies presents a new problem for scientific objectivity. This paper extends objectivity from knowledge production to knowledge transmission. It analyses how an overlooked type of agent—knowledge intermediaries—produces an overlooked type of trust—external trust. In practice, citizens rely on intermediaries to transmit trustworthy information. This paper argues that centralised techno-legal approaches, privileging AIs as epistemically superior intermediaries, risk epistemic harm to human intermediaries. In contrast, a decentralised intermediaries approach that values contestation among human intermediaries is a better way to transmit trustworthy information and resist misinformation.

PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.