Are you on the internet or using screen-based devices?

The concept of 'internet addiction' was introduced in the 1990s and has increasingly been recognized as a clinical and public health issue. Although umbrella terms can be useful for screening, theoretical considerations, and intervention planning, the term itself has received criticism because of its conceptual heterogeneity, implying an addiction to a medium and not including a wide range of problematic behavioral patterns that are below the diagnostic threshold of a clinical disorder. To address this criticism, we propose adopting the term 'problematic use' instead of 'addiction'. Furthermore, we argue that while 'problematic usage of the internet' is currently a useful umbrella term, recent technological advancements and increasing online presence may in the future require a conceptual and methodological shift in terminology from 'internet' to the more specific 'screen-based devices' or 'screens' that would enable more accurate assessment and intervention strategies. Terms focusing on specific devices, such as 'smartphone addiction,' should also be used with caution, as problematic use relates to applications rather than the hardware itself and may extend to various devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are you on the internet or using screen-based devices?

Andrea Czakó, Christian Montag, Orsolya Király, Jon D. Elhai et al.
1 citations
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
55.57
article

Are you on the internet or using screen-based devices?

Andrea Czakó, Christian Montag, Orsolya Király, Jon D. Elhai, Zsolt Demetrovics, Naomi A. Fineberg, Li Li, Matthias Brand, Mark D. Griffiths, Dan J. Stein, Marc N. Potenza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The concept of 'internet addiction' was introduced in the 1990s and has increasingly been recognized as a clinical and public health issue. Although umbrella terms can be useful for screening, theoretical considerations, and intervention planning, the term itself has received criticism because of its conceptual heterogeneity, implying an addiction to a medium and not including a wide range of problematic behavioral patterns that are below the diagnostic threshold of a clinical disorder. To address this criticism, we propose adopting the term 'problematic use' instead of 'addiction'. Furthermore, we argue that while 'problematic usage of the internet' is currently a useful umbrella term, recent technological advancements and increasing online presence may in the future require a conceptual and methodological shift in terminology from 'internet' to the more specific 'screen-based devices' or 'screens' that would enable more accurate assessment and intervention strategies. Terms focusing on specific devices, such as 'smartphone addiction,' should also be used with caution, as problematic use relates to applications rather than the hardware itself and may extend to various devices.

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), South African Medical Research Council (ZA), University of Minnesota (US), University of Hertfordshire (GB), Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), University of Cape Town (ZA), Flinders University (AU), University of Macau (MO), Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Yale University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Gannan Medical University (CN), Connecticut Mental Health Center (US), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW), Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US), University of Gibraltar, Nottingham Trent University (GB), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Toledo (US), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.